English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Of course for many Christians we see no PEACE EVER in the region until Jesus Christ returns, but I assume those who do not believe this you have another solution? if so what is it?

And I assume if a leader comes out of the Middle East can acheive PEACE with the Arabas and Jews you will be all for that?
Yes or no?
I think that is a simple question for those who will try to answe honestly.

2007-06-25 05:15:38 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

29 answers

Yes, it's so easy to just say Jesus will fix everything. Kind of takes the responsibility off of regular people, doesn't it.

Oh my god, what a cop-out. "I'm a believer, so I don't have to contribute my time to fixing anything, because Jesus will just fix it for me one day. Yay for me!!!"

2007-06-25 05:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by arkansaszippers 3 · 2 1

united states of america is "Johnny come recently" the concern is probably 2000 years previous and except there is the will for peace from the two components, it wont take place. Over the centuries those 2 communities have accomplished some distinctly poor issues to one yet another and that i in my opinion dont think of every physique can declare the "ethical extreme floor". Islams policies/rules as regards conversion and living in stay overall performance with different religions distinctly a lot places a cap on it on the 2nd. If we get the Imams and the Rabbi's to take a seat at the same time and rewrite distinctive the classic rules, then we've a wager. If all and sundry interior the area will become agnostics or atheists, then we've a wager....yet faith is obviously the stumbling block here and a few distinctly rattling poor atrocities are 2nd in line to that. Israel has nuclear power, yet are sitting on it (thank heaven for the individuals), whilst/if Islam gets nuclear power ie the bomb is whilst the actual disaster arises, because of the fact will they be waiting to take a seat on it? Frankly the individuals have not got any clue whilst it includes the middle East...if the reality be everyday, Britain is likely one in each and every of the only Western usa with some authority on the issue....and her contemporary-day politicians are dropping that awareness promptly.

2016-10-03 02:43:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well the QUESTION may be "simple" in the sense that it takes only a few simple words to ask it, but I don't think the ANSWER is.

The problem is big, complex, and caused over a long period of time, involving a lot of different groups of people.

First, peace can't be imposed by others.

It simply isn't the case that someone can come along and promise peace, without the support of solid majorities of people there, as well as agreement from the countries that have contributed to conflict.

Second, most people in the Middle East prefer peace --that's the place to start.

There are deep and serious problems, largely caused by European and U.S. interference. We need to immediately cease supporting all brutal and oppressive governments, and support all who seek peace.

In seeking peace, we'd also have to address a lot of the contributing factors, such as poverty and excessive greed.

Among other things, we'd need to shift things so the people who currently fun off with all the profits from the resources there no longer have the upper hand in keeping everyone down.

There would also need to be a psychological aspect, as there are many victims of torture and other trauma, and loved ones of same who would need to heal.

IF someone came along who had the support of the right people to actually bring about peace, of course I'd support that process, and do what I can to get my government to support that process.

I'm not a person to think mass murder and suffering are good things; ending them would be a plus.

The above is the best I can come up with off the top of my head.

As I say, it's not even close to simple -- if it were, it would have happened already.

2007-06-25 10:20:46 · answer #3 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 0

The only way the world will ever have a portion of peace is for religion to become something that is personal, private, and not ever involved in the political landscape of any country.

Do you not see that religion is the thing that tears people apart?

It's time to stop judging others by your personal faith - if we all do that, then we can keep religion out the government and the relations between the nations.

2007-06-25 05:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by yarn whore 5 · 1 0

Yes, there will be no peace in the region until Jesus Christ Almighty comes again. I absolutely agree.

People have been fighting over that land since there were people and the tribal warfare is too deeply entrenched for them to ever get along.

Peace has to become more important to them than honor or being right. There isn't anything anyone else can do, it's in their hands. We can nag and we can negotiate, but it's not our peace so it'll keep dissolving until they make the decision. It's their place, and their responsibility.

2007-06-25 05:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by KC 7 · 0 1

There will only be a "pseudo peace" achieved for a short time during the Tribulation. But, when the Antichrist gets doublecrossed by all involved, Armageddon will be set in motion. There will never be any true peace in that region of the world.

2007-06-25 06:36:02 · answer #6 · answered by bigvol662004 6 · 0 0

Remove all foreign troops...then let them (Iran, Iraq, Isreal, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and Afghanistan) slaughter each other. The one who "wins" will have no one left to oppress and spontaneous peace will ensue. In my bracket, I have it coming down to a championship matchup of Israel vs. Iran. However, this will only work if the US, Europe, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey keep their noses out of the matches (which will never happen).

You know I'm refering to a futball (aka soccer) tournament right? Perhaps chess would be better? Ms. Pacman?

Then after there is peace in the Middle East, we can have an Africa tournament.

2007-06-25 08:12:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well as a Middle Eastern and a Muslim, we do believe that Jesus (pbuh) will ascend and bring peace along another leader

anyway, for now, the leaders in our Arab world need to stop kissing up to the U.S and other Western countries, for doing that in the first place got us here.
and the U.S should stop middling here and we should stop asking that from them.
that's the first thing to do, secondly we should find some common ground to stop all the killings and such..
we need to reconcile, talk and obviously we wont be at rest until we stop naming Palestine as an occupied land
because in every conversation between Arabs it will always lead to Israel.
We need to figure things out over there, but since Palestinians are too busy killing off each other for helping Palestine..as they say
that seems like a far ..very far fetched idea..

2007-06-25 05:24:55 · answer #8 · answered by Razan 3 · 1 1

the anti=Christ is coming out of Europe or Middle East and I am kone of those who believe the Holy War will end when Muslims take over the world or Jesus returns and takes over all governments (only peace I see is if we stay away from them and let live their way of life)

2007-06-25 05:20:22 · answer #9 · answered by joyce s 3 · 0 0

When mankind learns of the laws of the soul then we shall begin to share all of the worlds food and goods.Maitreya himself will help us through these dark times that we are now going through.The path of God can be found in all of the worlds religions if one is coming with an open mind and heart.

2007-06-25 05:37:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is a time coming when truth will prevail and all false religions will at long last die,and leave the world to bask in the glory of freedom and peace.

2007-06-25 05:18:51 · answer #11 · answered by nikola333 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers