I hope so, because I read about it in the Bible.
2007-06-25 01:14:08 · 8 answers · asked by 2 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Appears to be OK. Still, you never know what that pudibund, fornicating censor will pull next.
2007-06-25 01:24:05 · update #1
If you read it in the Koran, would that make it Caliph-fornication ? (with apologies to the Red Hot Chilli Peppers)
2007-06-25 01:17:20 · answer #1 · answered by =42 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yahoo Answers doesn't necessarily block specific words, they probably block combinations. I'd bet $100 they use something called, Bayesian Filtering.
2007-06-25 08:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
True, Jim:
You will recall that when Jesus was under trial, one of the mob accused Peter of being a disciple. They could tell because his speech betrayed him.
You see, Jesus did told His followers to not use expletives. "let your yes be yes, and your no be no!"
Also, anytime angels are recorded speaking to men, they use direct communication without vulgar emphasis. For example, when Sarah heard she would be have a child in her old age, she laughed to herself. The angel rebuked her but Sarah lied and said she didn't laugh--the angel merely said: "But you did!"
Some of the words used on R&S are not appropriate, and users should educate their vocabulary to reflect intelligence.
Thus says my donkey, Balaam
2007-06-25 08:26:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It passed the asterisk test
2007-06-25 08:16:54 · answer #4 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess it is because your question came out without the asterisks.
2007-06-25 08:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by Phartzalot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its ok to say fornication, but not homo.
2007-06-25 08:17:57 · answer #6 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you will find out if your question is deleted.
2007-06-25 08:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. It didn't come out "***********", so you know it's OK.
2007-06-25 08:19:57 · answer #8 · answered by auntb93 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋