"If not all muslims are terorist , all terorists are muslim" is this statement is right? if not 100% , 99% ? and why??
2007-06-24 23:54:49 · 15 answers · asked by me and my mind 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If you had to pay for whatever education you got in 'logic', you need to ask to get your money back.
2007-06-25 01:55:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"If not all muslims are terorist , all terorists are muslim"
This is wrong. Islam doesnt preach terrorism.
In india we can see a lot of other religious gangs or political parties doing a lot of attacks n other activities. Media represent it as hooliganism or anything else. If its done by any muslim or any muslim group then its terrorism.
This is what happening in the whole world. Not a single religion preach terrorism. Its the individuals creating it.
Try to understand.
Take care
2007-06-25 07:03:12 · answer #2 · answered by kaun 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All muslims are humans.
Not all humans are muslims.
Some humans are terrorists.
Many terrorist claim they are muslims.
Many muslims call those terrorist as outcaste.
But some weak minded or victimized muslims accept terrorists as fellow muslims.
Logic in everything is foolishness. Humans are filled with flaws. Any pain inflictors, sadists, greedy and power crazy maniacs are class true baddies of humanity.
Ur statement is very negative. I am not any religion supporter but I respect the sentiments of innocent. This will certain hurt peoples sentiments. Certainly its like digging our own graves bro.
2007-06-26 09:03:21 · answer #3 · answered by M.L.M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course its not correct. Terrorism has been practiced by many groups, including atheists. (For example the Shining Path in Peru) In the United States there is more press given to Muslim terrorists, but believe me, they are not the only ones. Look at Northern Ireland in the past. Both sides claimed to be Christian. The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka are not Muslims.
2007-06-25 07:09:23 · answer #4 · answered by in a handbasket 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The statement is wrong. For example, George Washington was considered as a terrorist by the British, the British were considered as terrorists by the Boers in South Africa during the Boer War, the IRA were terrorists before they became politicians.
You can say "Not all criminals are terrorists but all terrorists are criminals" but even that is only true from the point of view of the country being terrorised. From another viewpoint the terrorist is a hero.
2007-06-25 07:24:35 · answer #5 · answered by John B 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not all muslims are terrorists .
But it is true that all terrorists ae Muslims ,
though ther eare otehr terrorists ,like the moaists, the LTTE's and , Naxals , they are very few, confined to certain locale areas fighting for some political cause .and pale into nothing when compoared to the Muslims who are resorting to terrorists activiteis for the cause of religions and killiing people who are in no way concerned with them.So all terrorists are generally said to be Muslims .
2007-06-25 14:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Infinity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorists are in all religions. But the people of that religion come out strongly against those people
But in Islam all Muslims keep quiet when terrorists in their religion says Islam permits the killing of non-believers and Islam prohibits the singing of Vande mataram.
Most of the Hindus condemn Gujrat riots but why dont most of the Muslims condemn terrorism and bloodshed that is happening in Kashmir against innocent Hindus and all over the world in the name of Islam?
http://www.kashmir-information.com/
Go and see that site.
2007-06-25 08:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.
and who will define the terminology for
honest, sincer and secular???
believe you me,
it may not be appropriate to narrate in terms of % but
one must have heard about ULFA, TAMIL TIGERS, BODOS,
NAXALITES, once upon a time in Punjab, to a little bit in one way or other way in Maharastra.. etc. etc..
you have asked for honest, sincier and secular...hence
i words are like this true, honest, with-out pre-jurisdice...
one may not agree with this,
2007-06-27 03:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by Karsan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's silly. What about ELF, Northern Ireland, the Basque separatists, the Christian anti-abortionists, and countless others?
And that's just using a fairly narrow definition of "terrorist". With just a little broadening, you wind up with both the Palestinians and the Israeli Jews, several African militias, a LOT more American Christians, the "support our troops" crowd, Greenpeace, and quite a bit more.
2007-06-25 06:58:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
No all terrorists aren't muslim. Did we forget about Timothy McVeigh???
2007-06-25 07:06:05 · answer #10 · answered by hypno_toad1 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋