Actually thousands of anti-Catholic "Christians" have been proven wrong.
Biblical apocalyptic literature predicts the coming of "the" Antichrist, the name given to the one who will be Christ’s chief enemy. This will be just one person.
It is not uncommon for fundamentalist writers or preachers to attach the label to a currently living person. By calling a second (or third or fourth) person "the" Antichrist, they show that they were wrong when they applied the title to the first person.
Every Pope since the time of Martin Luther has been labeled "the" Antichrist by at least one anti-Catholic "Christian," making each one incorrect (so far).
The adjective "anti-Christ" does not refer to the person prophesied in the Bible. It may be applied to an attitude or action judged to be fundamentally opposed to Christ and his message, for example: Hating others is anti-Christ.
With love in Christ.
2007-06-25 16:34:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
You claim to have proof that the Catholic Church, or more directly the Papacy in the Vatican, is really the anti-Christ.
You then go onto blame the Jesuits for several historical events including the assissinations of US Presidents. Please enlighten me by giving me proof of Jesuit involvement in the assassination of US presidents.
...the 9/11 attacks. Please enlighten me by giving me proof of Jesuit involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
...the Fedeal Reserve Bank. What about it and how are the Jesuit involved with it. Please enlighten me.
...the sinking of the Titanic. Please enlighten me by giving me proof of Jesuit involvement in the sinking of the TItanic.
...and many more. Such as?
You can claim the Catholic Church is responsible for anything, but it's your burden to present the evidence proving your claims. You have failed to do so, either because you are unable or unwilling to do so.
It makes no sense for you to be unwilling to present the proof. More likely, you are unable to present evidence because none exists.
This begs the question, WHY do you go about with accusations of the Catholic Church being responsible for said events plus "many more"?
2007-06-26 14:51:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daver 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes,we Catholics are also responsible for continental drift,the presence of kangaroos in Australia,the phases of the moon and the extinction of the dinosaurs.
Please demand your sources present "facts' before accusing us of such things that would be against all our interests ;otherwise,it is the crime of libel and the sin of malicious gossip.
What is proven is that along with sinners(who live against the teachings of their Church) the Holy Spirit has produced many great saints among Catholics and there would be no Christianity without us for Protestants to break of from. Also, most Protestants do not ascribe to" Pope as Antichrist"..
2007-06-26 11:23:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by James O 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a word, no.
http://www.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2617&contentID=4441&collectionID=795&shortcutID=5297
The Thirty Nine Articles (of the Church of England)
Bishop Jewel of Salisbury was given the task of reworking the Articles and although this was mostly very minor the missing article, number 29, was reinstated. So it was that, in 1571, Parliament and Convocation passed the Thirty-Nine Articles into law, and they were authorised both in English and Latin. Since 1571 the Articles have remained unchanged.
Church Society - Issues - History - Cranmer Intro
..."And as for the Pope, I refuse him, as Christ's enemy, and antichrist, with all his false doctrine." Summary Born 1489 Aslacton, Nottinghamshire. Ordained 1523 1529 Advised Henry VIII regarding divorce from Catherine of...
http://www.churchsociety.org/issues_new/history/iss_history_cranmer.asp
2007-06-25 04:53:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by pwwatson8888 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, I don't know about the sinking of the Titanic, but for more than a thousand years, the Vatican has done unspeakable crimes against humanity. Therefore I cannot see a God of Love or his son having anything to do with that organization.
2007-06-25 04:34:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
well jesus promised his holy roman catholic and apostolic church the guidance and protection of the holy spirit so to answer the church or the papacy are or will ever be the anti christ.
www.askmeaboutgod.org
www.scripturecatholic.com
www.fisheaters.com
www.salvationhistory.com
www.ewtn.com
www.catholiceducation.org
www.newdvent.org
more importantly the bible. try also the writings of the early church fathers.
2007-06-25 04:39:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by fenian1916 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
To your question, do you remember the Popes claim to "Vicar of Christ"?
Here is the essential part of a really long definition of "Vicar" from the websters 1828 Dictionary:
"In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."
By claiming to be the "Vicar of Christ", he is quite literally claiming to be a substitute for Christ. Scripture points out the lie, as there is only ONE mediator between man and God, and that is Christ.
1Ti 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
If scripture states outrightly, that there is only ONE mediator, specifically stated as Christ himself, then how possibly can anyone claim to "perform the functions" (mediate) of Christ? The popes claim is then against scripture, which is God-breathed. It is then against God, and his Son. "Anti" means "against". He would by definition then be anti-christ, but not necessarily THE anti-christ of revelations. He would be a "false christ":
Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Paul
2007-06-25 05:01:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by pauldude000 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I do not think it is proved or could be but there is a good chance many popes have been anti Christ as they seem to be put above him in the catholic faith.
2007-06-25 04:35:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mim 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes.Just study their doctrine for an hour or so.It doesn't take long to see it is antichrist.
2007-06-25 14:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Where in the heck did you get this from?
2007-06-27 22:13:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋