Its somewhere in Kentucky they try to use science to justify their belief in god...how sad...in the end they just look stupid!
2007-06-24 06:30:25 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Wrong. They use PSEUDO-science in a ludicrous attempt to CON the gullible into believing utter nonsense. Some "museum!"
2007-06-24 06:36:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
How much money is wasted in Los Vegas each year on gambling and mindless entertainment? How much will people plop down at the theater this weekend to see a sequel of a sequel? If we want to get into who wastes the most money on what, I’m sure we could come up with quite a list. As somebody who accepts evolution I have no use for this museum. But I sure will defend their right to expression.
2016-05-19 04:59:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's one in Canada too. The saddest part of all is that they are claiming that science proves what they are saying, when in fact, science says exactly the opposite of most of what they are saying. Anyone with a little bit of logical reasoning skills will know that this is somebody with weird religious beliefs trying to make their version of reality "fit the facts" by saying that it happened their way, even though it didn't. I predict this "museum" goes bankrupt.
2007-06-24 06:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Apparently it includes Dinosaurs sharing the forest with Adam and Eve.
It is ridiculous. If Fundamentalists claim the Bible is literally true, then where do they get the dinosaurs from. No mention of them in the Bible!!! Certainly Adam and Eve would have passed it down through the generations to avoid the dinosaurs. There was no knowledge of dinosaurs in biblical times, which is why there is no mention of them.
The only dinosaurs that appear in the Bible are those whose thinking cant get out of the box, and were caught up in rules and regulations. Jesus came to shake it all up. And he died for the trouble.
So I propose a round of applause to those who insist in going backwards, because they are too frightened to live outside the box. And by the way, keep on nailing him to the cross, while you condemn those who can't believe your teaching.
2007-06-24 06:52:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everyone interprets the evidence to justify their own hypothesis. Why not make a museum praising it?
I think it is ridiculous that they're using a museum as a theoretical paper. You can look at the artifacts in the Museum of Natural History and draw your own conclusion even. I'm a fan of the evolution one.
2007-06-24 06:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by sun of samsa 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Eldad above me, it is anti-science. Did you know that that 90% of the pre-eminent scientific minds in the world, i mean the BEST, hold no religious beliefs whatsoever. Still, if folk are willing to part with their $10 (or whatever it costs) to visit this musuem, then it's not up to me to stop them.
2007-06-24 06:37:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. This museum is just ten minutes from downtown Cincinnati where I live. I've been there. It's rather pathetic how they try to use science to justify their beliefs, as you said.
Science is the non-believer's relm. Back off.
2007-06-24 06:33:34 · answer #7 · answered by Eleni 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There's a great Toy/Doll museum in London. Hours of harmless fun.
2007-06-24 06:33:46 · answer #8 · answered by Namlevram 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they're showing that science, unchained from the usual naturalistic biases, supports creation rather than the "Fairy Tale of Evolution".
2007-06-24 06:52:13 · answer #9 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yea, you can find a museum for just about everything. That doesn't mean it's true..just something for fun.
2007-06-24 06:38:21 · answer #10 · answered by Vintage Glamour 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋