http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070624/ap_on_re_mi_ea/nuclear_iran_5;_ylt=ArCM2cTcSpz9TYxsI.VutcAL1vAI
I would say there trying to pull the same **** saddam tryed with the UN inspectors and should be delt with such
2007-06-23 19:29:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
think there doing it to get as far in research and devolpment before the UN sends coalition to dismantle this project before they sale to any terrorist organization
2007-06-23 19:33:57 · update #1
why cant the usa look after there own back yards and clean your country up and leave others to live how they want
2007-06-23 19:44:24 · answer #1 · answered by fanta 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To put it simply - should either the US or Israel with the nod of the US ( they can't do anything unless the US approves and gives the Ok) attack Iran, ALL hell will break lose. It means the beginning ( we are already in the beginning of it) of WW III. The US military is stretched beyond efficiency to effectively invade Iran with ground forces. That is a losing proposition and opens up the gates of hell. The only option is air power...... may be tactical nukes. neutron bombs to put a dent into their nuclear capability..... like the Israelis did with Saddam in the 80s by blowing up his reactor with a few precision bombs dropped from planes.
I don't understand why the West is ever giving more time in that see saw game... for years now... while Iran is just playing games and gaining year after year to complete the bomb. Dumb West!
2007-06-24 03:12:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
All for it. I think we should do Iran much differently though. Don't turn the Country into a Muslim Democracy and don't try to roll in your tanks "peacefully". Listen to the commanders on the Ground and our Political leaders better not by Politically Correct sissies.
2007-06-24 02:45:33 · answer #3 · answered by jerichovonhog 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The US military is stretched way beyond capacity, a full-scale ground invasion of a nation that fought a 10 year war of attrition with it's neighbor would just be ridiculous.
2007-06-24 03:53:58 · answer #4 · answered by Jase 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ok.one question here:
which is the terrorists/rogue country?
A) a country who again and again saying that their nuclear is only for peaceful use OR
B) a country who again and again always wants to use FORCE (biggest military spender in the world), already used it against other country and trigger happy soldiers in iraq
C) a small country (built by spilling the blood of the middle eastern natives), has the most advanced weaponry systems in its region, killing has become their best way to train soldiers and lastly admits openly they have over 200 nuclear warheads.
the answer?you choose...
2007-06-24 03:03:50 · answer #5 · answered by der Bomber 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I prefer the Clinton technique of bombing people from the air and not invading.
A single B2 loaded with B61-11s would take care of Iran's nuclear assets quite nicely.
2007-06-24 02:59:42 · answer #6 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The only goal that would work is to kill the people and steal the oil. They are already a Democratic society.
2007-06-24 04:20:21 · answer #7 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Man o man im so tried of this so much conflict some much sh!t the U.S. is geeting its self into, we are basicly in a sh!thole with bush digging the grave deeper.....
2007-06-24 02:47:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would say it's about damn time! Most of the insurgency seems to be coming from there anyway. I say we blow em all to hell!
2007-06-24 03:24:35 · answer #9 · answered by fiestacarsrule 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not a good idea you will get your butts kicked just nuke them and be done with it.
2007-06-24 02:39:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋