I see more and more democrats and republicans avoiding name calling, expressing their protest and support of the war in respectful ways, avoiding rumor-mongering while asking pointed questions, and treating our politicians as "innocent until proved guilty" instead of the other way around.
I see people who insult and make up things getting lots of thumbs down, and lots of responses telling them what people dislike about their approach.
I see people putting their country first, and their ideology second, regardless of their side, and not treating the other half of the country as the enemy as much as fellow Americans whom we disagree with on how best to help America.
"Hating America" doesn't seem to be "cool" anymore. I wished for this. I seem to be seeing it. Am I mistaken?
Is patriotism winning in Yahoo! Answers? (With respects to our non-United States participants).
2007-06-23
15:16:30
·
10 answers
·
asked by
mckenziecalhoun
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Civic Participation
Mochrie, for example: socialism that would would rather see our country fail rather than become anti-socialist.
2007-06-23
15:26:35 ·
update #1
tamarlz, been here for a long time. My perspective goes back to February, a few months before you began. You should have seen it then.
Molly, good to meet an Australian patriot in the sense YOU mean. That's the patriotism I'm talking about. Anyone can claim to be a patriot, but calling one of our allies Anti-American because they use free speech? You and I both know that's not a patriot. Glad you're here. Disagree with you on the war. Glad you're speaking up about what you believe without being nasty about it. We need more of that.
ToYou,Too! Sounds like you've gotten an ear full. I'd be interested in the proof of what you are saying (not rumor), otherwise you are demonstrating quite well exactly what I am talking about. Rumor mongering isn't limited to Dem/Rep.
cadcommando200, nice to meet you. Be sure to carry it over to republicans just as I do with democrats. If we don't point it out in our own party, we deserve the next cycle of abuse (ala Former President Clinton).
2007-06-24
05:56:45 ·
update #2
rabble rouser, who are you kidding. Look at your name you silly goose! I know what you mean, yet if you don't call him names, or make up things about him, or insinuate things about him you have no proof (court proof) about him, then you ARE respecting the Presidency. The ideas aren't crazy, and aren't seditious in themselves. Supporting the war can be seditious if used to talk about undermining a democrat representative, etc. Same the other way, of course. Keep speaking up regardless.
Actually, the healthcare program is a socialist idea. I'm one of those you have trouble with, I suspect, but that's a difference in ideology. If you don't put it ahead of your country, then you aren't unpatriotic. If you put your country first, you are a patriot.
Let's fight together to make this forum more direct, more patriotic. We lose nothing, free speech becomes easier (Patriot DOESN'T mean treating other Americans badly because they disagree with you on how best to help America).
2007-06-24
06:03:21 ·
update #3
But Stony! I don't use it! Or do you mean they are blocking me? Goodness, I'm not sure how I feel about that. Their right, I suppose, but how do they expect me to learn from them if they block ME from seeing THEM?
2007-06-24
14:01:21 ·
update #4