The Vatican is a gainst condom use, even between *married* couples , because it claims condoms do not prevent the transmission of HIV.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/aids/story/0,7369,1059068,00.html
But the overwhelming evidence shows that routine condom use prevents HIV transmission 80% of the time or more. This is backed up by the US government, the WHO, the UN, and American Medical Association:
http://www.thebody.com/content/art17057.html
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=8534&Cr=&Cr1=
http://www.unaids.org/en/MediaCentre/References/default.asp
What is the bigger sin against humanity - sex (marital or extra-marital) or denying basic protection against an extremely preventable but deadly disease?
2007-06-23
08:20:06
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Midge:
If you read any of the links provided, or if you ever look into any literature from any government/medical organization, you will see abstainance is always mentioned *first* and as the only 100% effective way to prevent HIV.
How many adult Catholics your age do you know have obstained 100% from premarital/extra-marital sex? Is this a sin that *deserves* to be punished with HIV?
What about a faithful wife whose husband strays: the husband picks up HIV from a prostitute and then infects his wife and subsequent children? Happens often in Africa. Shouldn't the wife be protected? If the husband used a condom with the prostitute, there would be an 80% less chance that the wife and kids had AIDS.
2007-06-23
09:40:46 ·
update #1