English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will they finally secure our borders and kick out the illegal squatters in our country? How many times do the American people have to say no to this crap before the Senate stops trying to give away the country?

2007-06-23 06:44:04 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

19 answers

You dont reward people that break the law, and...what about the people that wait for a visa the leagl way? we penalize them and reward criminals? thats stupid...so deport all illegals. period.

The only reason there is any laws considered is that business that pays low wages wants to keep the illegal workers so they can keep high windfall profits.....if these companies with special interest paid a decent wage, there would be plenty of Americans to take that work.

Force these people out of business, let the government auction off the properties where greedy selfish landowners hire illegals.

2007-06-23 06:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by captainamerica 3 · 9 1

I don't see how. It hasn't stopped Ted (the drunk) Kennedy so far. He'll still be pushing for it even if they start an open season on all illegals.

The good thing is, there have been three more senators whom have switched sides on this matter and are now voting against the bill. Thank God for small miracles.

2007-06-23 07:52:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Most of the Senators know that the majority of Americans are against this bill and the polls show it. However, they don't care as they are bowing down to their high dollar donors. the senate will pass this shamesty bill and the house will slam it down as they have done in the past. thank God for the house reps that are listening to the majority

2007-06-23 07:29:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

We must speak as many times as it takes. However, I am now convinced our best hopes lie in the House. Their bill makes more sense. If the Senate proceeds, the House will deny Bush his "see ya on signing day".

2007-06-23 07:30:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

permit me first admit to lack of knowledge of your amnesty invoice, i'm from the united kingdom. people who've responded your question so a tactics, from whichever area of the argument, look asserting that majority opinion backs up their reason. This of course won't be able to be ultimate. am i able to element out a internet site the place human beings can count selection the numbers in help of their argument, on any subject from interior of reach to international, in over 25,000 administrative divisions of all 244 inhabited international places. Now it relatively is back up to your point of view. possibly you could as properly help shape coverage.

2016-10-03 00:33:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The more you expect from the Senate
the more you will be disappointed.
The only way to be 100% satisfied is if you expect nothing at all.

2007-06-23 06:49:39 · answer #6 · answered by TedEx 7 · 4 0

They'll keep trying as long as they think they might be able to get people to either not notice or to buy the line that they're really going to enforce border security this time and that "a path to citizenship" isn't amnesty.

2007-06-23 06:48:10 · answer #7 · answered by kscottmccormick 6 · 7 1

I would rather see strong laws for employers knowingly hiring illegals. Corporate American is responsible for giving these people the motivation for coming here in the first place. Shame on these American employers that put us in the position to tell these nice people they have to go home even though they were just trying to better themselves. They might of came over illegally but they have the morals to help better their family so I am less likely to blame the victim.

2007-06-23 06:54:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

I think the bill should start in the House, as expenditure bills are supposed to do under the Constitution - using House drafted boilerplate.

The stuff the press never reports is at least as bad as the stuff they do.

2007-06-23 06:51:16 · answer #9 · answered by DAR 7 · 3 1

Nope. They'll try to figure out another way to screw us.

Remember: most are not up for re-election this year, so they don't have to "do what the people want." They work for whomever pays the most.

Rather cynical, I admit, but I can think of no other explanation for this fiasco.

2007-06-23 06:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by laser9999999 2 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers