Can anyone pls define weapons of mass destruction?

Answer 1

Weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a term used to describe a massive weapon with the capacity to indiscriminately kill or incapacitate. The phrase broadly encompasses several areas of weapon synthesis, including nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC) and, increasingly, radiological weapons. There is controversy over when the term was first used, either in 1937 (in reference to the mass destruction of Guernica, Spain, by aerial bombardment) or in 1945 (with reference to nuclear weapons). Following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and progressing through the Cold War, the term came to refer more to non-conventional weapons. The phrase entered widespread popular usage in relation to the U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq. Terms used in a military context include atomic, biological, and chemical warfare (ABC warfare), nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) after the invention of the hydrogen bomb, and chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN), recognizing the threat of non-explosive radiological weapons.

Due to the indiscriminate impacts caused by WMD, the fear of WMD has shaped political policies and campaigns, fostered social movements, and has been the central theme of many films. Support for different levels of WMD development and control varies nationally and internationally. Yet understanding of the nature of the threats is not high, in part because of imprecise usage of the term by politicians and the media.

Answer 2

Define Weapon Of Mass Destruction

Answer 3

Weapons of Mass Destruction are officially defined as Nuclear weapons, Biological weapons or Chemical weapons. NBC weapons are acknowledged to be identical an attack by one can and will be met with another one. Normal weapons can cause damage over maybe a square mile and several hundred casualties by a single weapon. Then they are done with. Weapons of mass destruction will destroy several hundred time that and are often persistent. IE fallout, anthrax spores, VX nerve agent. all my last for years.

Answer 4

frequently a weapon which will kill 1000's or perhaps hundreds. So issues like nuclear warheads and poisonous brokers like nerve gasoline, poison gases etc. those weapons would be further with the aid of plane or missiles and don't could inevitably be a right away hit to reason deaths. relatively a weapon designed to reason huge deaths or harm with one launch and probable durable effects. known bombs and such would reason 1000's of deaths however the area of effect is often relatively small the place as WMD regularly would cover a plenty greater effective area. So a classic bomb would cover numerous undred ft a WMD would cover numerous miles (or perhaps an entire city).

Answer 5

Weapons of mass destruction usually refer to a large nuclear bomb,chemical bomb or atom bomb that has the capability of destroying a very large city/county with its initial impact, not including the destruction o f its aftermath. It will basically level everything and kill everyone for hundreds of miles (HIROSHIMA)

Answer 6

A weapon with capabilities, that can wipe out a large population with only a little bit of it used. Also weapons that cause long term damage, such as birth defects etc. These types of weapons would be hydrogen bombs and chemical warfare.

Answer 7

weapons of nuclear, biological, and chemical sources that kill in a larger scale then just the explosive capabilities. Most will continue to kill after detonation

Answer 8

Nuclear weapons
Chemical weapons (nerve, blister, and blood)
Biological weapons (virus used to infect a populace)

Answer 9

Weapons that kill over a large, or expansive area. Such as chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

Answer 10

Bushes Mouth!