I know that a lot of people are against the Death Penalty, but what about when it comes to people such as Charles Manson? I don't think he's ever apologized for the chaos he caused nor has he sought help or is trying to seek help for his issues while in prison. He's refused all rehabilitation courses, refused eval classes, and so on. He was denied parole on May 23rd. he's up for parole again in 2012. I believe that if he gets out, he may go on another rampage? What do you think? Shouldn't he have just been given lethal injection or something to that extent? He seems like the most vile creature ever.
2007-06-22 13:43:56 · 17 answers · asked by Miley 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
He should have been executed years ago, but because of all the liberals.... that's another story. I wouldn't be surprised if California never sees another execution again. With all the appeals the criminals get, it's too expensive.
2007-06-22 13:48:05 · answer #1 · answered by Bestie 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The only people that are getting punished in this debacle of justice is Sharon Tate's family who sit in on the parole hearings to give a voice to the victims.
Manson is a prime example of playing the system he only committed the crimes after they abolished the death penalty knowing he would not be in jail forever he will try and try and eventually he will get out.
I always think that life in prison should mean exactly that when crime is committed if there is no death penalty they should be there for the term of their natural life see how many of them want the death penalty then if there is no hope of release.
2007-06-22 13:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by molly 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I support the death penalty and would like to see it used more often. Our jails are full because there is no real punishment. If we had stricter laws we'd have less crimes. What is the purpose of life without parole? Dispose of them like they did their innocent victims. I think the prison doors should be left open once in a while to help minimize the population within also and save the tax payers some money.
2016-05-17 23:30:01 · answer #3 · answered by jeana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was terrified by Manson's crimes. I'm no celebrity...but there are crazies out there who imitate what they see or read in the Media. I cannot judge another person to the extent of even WISHING for their death...but that he is even eligible for parole is a parody of justice. Eternal solitary confinement is too good for these monsters. They are inhuman.... not deserving of humane considerations. Sorry if that's harsh...but enough's enough.
2007-06-22 13:56:17 · answer #4 · answered by Gina C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I am a big proponent of the death penalty. It has its place. But, Manson was never convicted of murder, and we have no evidence that he ever committed a murder himself. Thus, if we follow the law of our land, the most we can do to him is imprison him for life. No grounds for execution. Anyway, due to his legacy alone, he'll never be parolled. Don't worry about him. We've got plenty of psychos to worry about out here.
2007-06-22 20:27:47 · answer #5 · answered by hopefulcorpsman09 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some one like Manson desires death, mean to the bone and could never change, I am against the death penalty in some cases but not with this one, nothing could ever be done to change his ways..
2007-06-22 13:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by xyz 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure I am against the Death Penalty but I will make and exception in his case. After ever thing he did as far as I am concerned then and cut off his b-------- and shove them up his azz...
He has no business on the streets - he will go and do the same thing again, who the heck would be so stupid as to turn that thing loose on the streets again, if they do they need their thing removed and shoved up their azz'z
2007-06-22 13:52:18 · answer #7 · answered by Angell 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Charles Manson was originally sentenced to death, It was commuted to life in the early 70's.
2007-06-22 13:50:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why isn't he dead yet? He forfeited his life almost 40 years ago. He should have been six feet under by now. Here's why he is still alive...bleeding heart California liberals and a Federal Court that likes to legislate from the bench. Can we execute those judges with him? They're just as criminal.
2007-06-22 13:48:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I'm against the death penalty but I have no problem with him continuing to be locked away.
2007-06-22 13:55:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋