Having established that the anthropogenic signal swamped out the natural signal in about 1960, lets move on to the next question that I have.
The signal post 1960 is considered to be anthropogenic, am I to take it that this means strictly CO2 produced by human activities? Or, is anthropogenic to be used in a broader sense that includes farming, ranching, urban growth, deforestation, etc?
2007-06-22
11:34:20
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Marc G
4
in
Environment
➔ Global Warming
Bob:
Here is the problem that I have with the IPCC. It can be found in table 2.11.
The only thing they have a high level of understanding of is LLGHG's. Everything else is medium or less. Attributing at this point seems to be putting the cart before the horse.
2007-06-22
12:38:22 ·
update #1
Dana:
What about other human factors such as land use? Are they not important?
2007-06-22
12:39:12 ·
update #2
Trevor:
Thanks, I thought so. Just wanted to make sure so that I am on the right page.
2007-06-22
19:29:47 ·
update #3