English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ahhhh the good old days when we had an effective and affordable sugar substitute. it was removed from the market cause some scientist gave a rat 20 jillion more times the amount a human would ever ingest in a life time and the rat got cancer. Then we got sacharin (gag) and asparatame ( gag again) and they too cause cancer in labratory animals.

Splenda is pretty good, but how soon will (sucralose) be labeled as "causing something in lab rats" and why cant we go back to cyclamates?

2007-06-22 08:13:58 · 4 answers · asked by ImJstBob 4 in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

4 answers

Stevia is a better all natural sugar substitute,with out the worries of a possible health challenge from useage....it is available in most health food stores.(or course this us comming from a guy who drinks kale and celery juice(yummy...well not really yummy.
Good to see ya bro.

2007-06-22 09:03:30 · answer #1 · answered by bonsai bobby 7 · 0 0

I understand the sugar causes cancer in rats, too, with the proper dosage.

2007-06-22 08:21:57 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel C 5 · 0 0

It just amazes me how the FDA can worry about a non-issue and then say nothing about tainted foods coming from Mexico and China...

2007-06-22 08:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they always take everything that is GOOD away from you because they say it is BAD for you.
I hate that.

2007-06-22 08:20:48 · answer #4 · answered by kimmer727 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers