English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is there such a thing as partial ignorance?
like if I talked to voices, did secret rituals, and destroyed society and the world in a dream as a child and I did this willfully, will I be held accountable even though I was fourteen and didn't really know the reality of the situation at the time?

2007-06-22 06:53:35 · 4 answers · asked by Silly BaBy505 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

4 answers

At 14 you know, but this is why younger children arent accountable for crimes.

You dont have to be fully aware, but you dont have to be very old or intelligent to have at least a basic understanding of right and wrong.

2007-06-22 07:00:38 · answer #1 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 1 0

mr: The onus of responsibility is on the person or persons to be made aware, that failing to exercise love and out-going concern for others DOES result in crime and devastation for others. In the case of the children of the lack of any capacity to comprehend instruction at a mature level, the parents or parent of the child need to be working with the child(ren) to make love and out-going concern the focus or goal for living on this earth. Now; we have to address those who have made their minds up to function in living life to the contrary. Society has to be protected from those, who knowingly, have decided to follow a life of hurting others or the system plainly, breaks down, ultimately ! We all dream evil and bad things but it's what you actually DO to others that determines whether or not you are a loveless and narcissistic (selfish) person bent on the destruction of others. God knows that we are not ideally, perfect and fail to be expressing love to others; therefore, to answer your question - God's mercy is available to YOU for any wilful harm to others, through Jesus Christ. Accept this mercy (God offers it to you) and ask him for the help to avoid hurting others - willfully.

2007-06-22 07:15:01 · answer #2 · answered by guraqt2me 7 · 0 0

mothers and dads ought to no longer be watching infants one hundred% of the time and something close to to that's overprotective and ends up in insurrection, which contain criminal habit later in existence. Its the theory "in case you do no longer want me to try this i will scheme and do some thing even worse, some thing which you will no longer even think of i'm able to you watch me" or in step with probability that's what got here approximately to the guy whose existence tale appeared in "seize me in case you may" you may no longer positioned mothers and dads in detention center for crimes thier infants did, so the appropriate is juvenile hall even with the undeniable fact that, you may make mothers and dads financially in charge in civil situations against some thing committed with the aid of a minor, this is incorrect yet nonetheless the be certain can punish the newborn for the be certain's very own punishment with issues which includes "no new something" and then rigidity the newborn, if going to college, to apply final years college ingredients.

2016-12-13 10:17:45 · answer #3 · answered by rosalee 4 · 0 0

Remember this only my opinion...But I say Yes you are accountable. If you are old enough to know its wrong and do it anyway then you have to take responsibilites for your actions.
Sorry if this isn't what you wanted to hear.

2007-06-22 07:02:39 · answer #4 · answered by curious_59 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers