English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-22 01:59:35 · 16 answers · asked by dggfh f 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

The term false flag describes a covert action undertaken by a government with the intention of making it appear that someone else perpetrated it.

If you accept that 9/11 was a false flag then you believe the US government perpetrated the terrorist attack. This single grand assumptions has a multitude of other assumptions that must necessarily be accepted also. Here are just a couple:

+ The US government, or some amalgamation of the military-industrial complex, purposefully planned and executed a terrorist attack resulting in the death of thousands of civilians of their own country. This was done in an effort to justify a war with Iraq *and* Afghanistan.

+ The planning and execution of this covert action has escaped the attention of virtually every human being not directly involved in it, except you and a handful of others. *You* can see through their veil of lies and deceit. The rest of us can't for some reason.

Now I have some questions for you and your tin-hat cohorts:

How many people would it take to execute this attack? How many people or groups are in on it? If they are so clever and secret then why is some kid with a computer able to crack the code but the rest of us aren't? What is this group's motivation, a war in Iraq? Why, for the oil? Are we benefiting from that war now? Have we at any point in the past? Were the planes really hijacked? If they were, were they true believers who were deceived by "the government" of the US, Israel, Big Business, or some other conspiratorial committee? What *exactly* is the group we're talking about here? Why such a grand scale? Why not bomb some orphanage instead?

There are so many holes in your little theory that I could spend all day writing this, so I'll just boil it down to the smallest kernel: You and other conspiracy theorists don't investigate all aspects and then arrive at a conclusion, you *start* with the premise that some nebulous group perpetrated the attack and then cherry pick data that supports this assumption.

2007-06-22 02:43:04 · answer #1 · answered by Peter D 7 · 1 1

so "gfggfs h"..the 911 "scholar" has the smoking gun on the September 11th attacks being perpetuated by the US government.. not a respected journalist like say... ohh brian rosss.. or someone in the new york times... or someone in the BBC.... but "gfggfs h" has the insider info the "Government doesnt want you to know" right... hopefully youll come back to reality if a democrat gets elected... at least then.. this extreme left psychobabble will tone down... cuz sometimes id rather have a democrat be president than hear 4 more years of this nonsense.... in respose.... ive already researched this ive watched all the videos, seen the "evidence" ive done all of that.... i fell for it too... i said hey this is wierd... this isnt right... but its just another blame america for the worlds problems capitalisms the root of all evil the zionist new world order free mason global takeover never ending nonesense.... this is coming from someone young who believed this crap (Im 20 yrs old now) use your basic common sense and youll realize this can never be true... let alone the debunking of all the claims alledge by the "scholars"... this is such nonesense.... President Bush and his Administration of Evil killed over 300 Americans for an excuse to go to war all over the globe... yet, when they make the case for Iraq... Falsifying the evidence of WMDs or for that matter.. Nuclear Weapons was too big of a task to do.... so your saying he can lie and cover up 911 to the world... but he cant make phony documents about WMDs and a link with Al Queda so they dont come out looking like complete douchebags.... and if you think that this hasnt been shown on cable news... you obviously dont watch the news.. and spend your times on Infowars or loose change... ive seen this presented on every cable news station... problem is.. the person thats making the claim ends up looking like a complete nutcase saying "OHH THERES NO ALQUEDA, THERES NO BIN LADEN, ITS THE CIA!! yeah!! its all a big puppet show" Rosie has said this time and time again while she was on the view, i even saw alex jones... mr Bohemian Grove on CNN headline news spitting the same old rhetoric... and your wrong... this arent liberals saying this... most level headed liberals denounce this nonesense... USE YOUR HEAD!!! and i actually have a copy of the 911 commission and nowhere in there does it show evidence of an "Inside Job" again... if it did... it would of made headlines across the globe... its funny how you people use astrophysics and complex logic to claim your evidence... but you cant answer simple questions like... if no plane hit the pentagon where are all the passengers? are they in a military bunker somewhere? let me guess... it was a fighter drone and the passengers are all CIA agents right... should of done my research huh...

2016-05-17 09:14:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What on earth is a false flag?

2007-06-22 02:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7 · 3 0

False flag of what?

2007-06-22 02:37:18 · answer #4 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 0 0

you can go to hell you false American. patriotism is every Americans obligation to a country that has protected them from destruction. i know we've been in some stupid wars but dont ever say sep11 was false

2007-06-22 02:05:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Cannot be more "false" than the bunch of cowards that only fight from their hideaway caves, ...train others to fight their personal wars, ...have their faces always covered, ...depend on remote terrorist attacks, ...putting bombs so they don't have to be face to face with others, or, ...brainwashing
illiterate fanatics to blow themselves up. Those are "warriors of nothing", those are plain COWARDS.

2007-06-22 02:29:14 · answer #6 · answered by Millie 7 · 1 0

I know that 9/11 was a terrorist attack; a false flag is something completly different.

2007-06-22 02:02:30 · answer #7 · answered by wizjp 7 · 4 1

I don't understand what you mean otherwise I'd answer your question. A few more details would be helpful.

2007-06-22 02:02:50 · answer #8 · answered by Yogini 6 · 3 0

Didn't look false to me

2007-06-22 02:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Did you know this isn't the proper forum for this question?

2007-06-22 02:06:47 · answer #10 · answered by Machaira 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers