2007-06-21 21:53:26 · 8 answers · asked by ferfly 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I hate animal testing, its wrong wrong wrong i was thinking about going on a protest
2007-06-21 21:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you can eat a killed animal, then testing a medicine is not different at all.
Would you care as much if it was tested on alligators or cockroaches?
The larger crime is when people claim animal rights and then designate them as a second class. Are you prepared for a lawsuit filed on behalf of your dog or cat for forcible confinement, kidnapping and assault? Dogslaughter charges for someone who neglects an animal?
Personally, I prefer computer modelling for a great deal of science.
2007-06-21 23:12:26 · answer #2 · answered by guru 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Animals die evil deaths anyway, kittens fed to python snake fiends, puppies beaten with hammers in gunney sacks, birds devoured by the millions daily, cattle butchered as fast as technology can do it, and your worried about testing on a slender few animals, rats, pigs, and the like. Get real. We have a cat you can test, right now. But the ex is out, she won't do it.
2007-06-21 22:33:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it relatively is morally appropriate to apply human beings for study. I additionally understand animals have been precious in scientific study. Scientists for the main area cope with animals with understand. it relatively is costly to apply animals for sorting out purposes, so it rather is the appropriate pastime of a researcher to get the main out of this effectual source. consequently, it does no longer make considering that to apply the animals in sorting out which might reason the untimely dying of the animals. i'd quite no longer see human beings subjected to risky, unknown effects. only as human beings should not be subjected to cruel and weird and wonderful situations for study, neither could animals. human beings are waiting to furnish consent to study yet animals are no longer waiting to realize this. it relatively is one significant reason that animal sorting out is under appropriate.
2016-10-02 22:42:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I only feel it is OK, if it is for a greater caue, such as saving lives, and if that is the only way to go about it. If it is for something like cosmetics, then I feel it abhorrent.
2007-06-21 21:57:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How many chickens died before Grandma's chicken soup was perfected?...Test away...
2007-06-25 06:29:21 · answer #6 · answered by Domino 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK...we'll just use your grandmother since she's gonna die anyway! It takes a living organism to test on!
2007-06-21 22:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by nan 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
SUX big time.
2007-06-21 22:02:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋