English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-21 21:44:36 · 4 answers · asked by starbrightlight 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

No. u can sue only with its consent. I had sued on our state govt for not responding on my actionplan operation india 2000. CMs office responded at once and promised for appropriate usage. Again I am complaining that All the mail ids of the Present MPs are bogus.
               
Why because I had personally derived the ids from the Govt of india portal and sent mail to every body. But no mail was properly delivered. Every mail was returned
 
Herewith I am submitting few lines for clearing you why I had tried to mail the MPs.
 
Sir I had drafted a fine plan to solve all the problems of India. I had named it as operation India 2000. In 11th of June 1998 itself I had sent 200 printed copies of the plan to the Loksabha speaker and requested him to arrange for the distribution of the same to MPs. 
 
In beginning they hadn’t responded on the receipt of the parcel. After the initiation taken by our MP Sri.N.Ramakrishna Reddy
Denied the receipt of the plan. I had sent them the proof of delivery. Then they wrote me that they couldn’t trace the parcel in their office. They had requested me to send a fresh copy and they would make many copies and disburse them to the MPs. I had sent on the same day. But they hadn’t done it even on this day.
I had communicated this plan to our cms office also. (From November of 97). But no response in spite of 1000s of reminders. According to the information act I had approached the District Information officer, Stae information officer with in the prescribed gape. But there was no information. Recently on 10th of July I had approached the information commission. It may pronounce its judgment with in days.
 
It is for ur kind information. Kindly publish/telecast the facts .If u want more details and evidences visit my sites: http//:www.geocities.com\ambapaluku
 
The main points of above said  plan.
1.Implementing presidential form of govt.
2.Appointing a special army with 10 core unemployed youth.
3.Handing over the project of linking Indian rivers to them.
4.Abolishing present currency and introducing new one.
5.Undertaking all the agricultural lands after paying compensation in shape of bonds payable in double after five years.
6.Implementing co-operative farming.
1.Implementing presidential form of govt.
By this chief executive of the country will behaving power to implement the next coming points. There will be stability.
2.Appointing a special army with 10 cores unemployed youth.
By this all the unemployed will be given chance to contribute to the national income and have a share(precipitate income)
3. Handing over the project of linking Indian rivers to them.
The north part of the nation is suffering with floods and south part of the nation is suffering with drought. Linking all Indian rivers is the only solution. Anyhow the Indian economy is depended on agriculture. Irrigation is a fundamental need for successful agriculture.
If this project is handed to any pvt construction company it will take minimum 100 years. If it is handed to the special military formed with the 10crore unemployed youth it can be completed with in 5years.
4. Abolishing present currency and introducing new one
The black money prevailing in the Indian market is the only cause for hike in prices, falling govts etc. there is no other measure to root out the black money.
5. Undertaking all the agricultural lands after paying compensation in shape of bonds payable in double after five years.
Factors of productions are four. Land,labour,capital,and organization. In India there are two classes one is ruling and another is ruled. The 3factors of production ( land, capital and organization are in the hands of ruled class. only the labor is in the hands of ruled class. In this condition at least the land can be plucked by the govt from the hands of ruling class. To avoid violence the govt can give proper compensation. As there is no source it can give it in shape of Bond payable after 5 years.
 
6. Implementing co-operative farming
.By this the returns from the lands will go to the members and every member will work hard for the good result. Large scale production will be possible.
My trails to communicate this to the Indian govt:
On 11-6-98 I had sent 200 copies of the plan to the loksabha speaker and requested to distribute the MPs.First they denied the receipt then asked for fresh copy. I had sent but in vain. Finally I had sentRs.50/- through a postal order towards postage to return the plan copies. It was delivered. But still the plan copies are pending in the office of the speaker, Loksabha.
Bitter experience with the office of the CM of Andhra Pradesh:
From November of 1997 I am sending the copies of my plan. On 22nd of April 2002 I had sent mo for Rs.10towards postage to respond on my plan. It was delivered. I had complained to the CLP leader DR.YS (he is the present cm).
I think he had influenced the pahee. On 3rd ofAugest 2002 the Deputy Secretary to cm had sent me a note to send my proposals to place the same before thecm. I had sent. But no response in spite of many reminders. I had field a petition before the district consumer’s forum in chittoor. By knowing this through dailies the deputy secretary of cm had wrote me and promised for the appropriate usage of my plan. When my mo was delivered and cm office hadn’t responded I had wrote to the clip leader (Present cm) the office of the clip leader had responded in favour.Even though the regime of chandrababu was over the same officials are continuing in pahee. They are plan fully doing their best to hide my letters from the eyes of the cm.
Hunger strike for 10 days:
Only to communicate the problem to the cm I had sat on hunger strike from 2nd of October 2004. Media had covered well the issue. Revenue report gone. Police report gone. Intelligence report gone .The sp had conveyed regrets on the negligence of the cm pasheeand promised me that he will take this to the noticeof the cm. But invain. Responding to my emails the cmpashee sent a mail and instructed me to contact thecollector. I had contacted. But in spite of manyreminders there was no response.
Padhayathra to the capital:
Due to this I had announced a padhayathra to thestatecapital to meet the cm on 8th of april 2005.. Butthe leaders of BC,SC,Vaddara,Madhiga sangams hadrendered unconditional support to my plan operationIndia 2000 and requested me to go by bus if I do sothey will also accompany me. So that I had dropped and planning for a bus yathra to the state capital. Ifmy plan comes out. India will be prosperous and willcome out from the worldwide trap of USA.
Complained to the State Information commission on 10th of Julu2006:
I had complained to the state information commission.(as the district and state information officers hadnt responded with in the prescribed intervel). The commission is to give its openion likeely with in days

2007-06-21 21:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by chittoor .yes.Murugeshan 2 · 0 0

First, can a person sue a State? Definitely yes to that question, but without its consent, I think it is immaterial to the filing of the case, whether the consent of the State is present or not, the person has the right to sue the State. Which State you are planning to sue? Chicago or Maryland?

Now here comes your second question, can a person sue a country without its consent? My goodness, you are planning to be a lawyer someday? I think this is definitely out of statue, that an individual cannot sue a country without its consent. In the first place how can an individual sue a country even without consulting his own country regarding the case. A person cannot sue a country with or without its consent but a country to country law suit definitely yes. In other words protocol to protocol. But an individual acting for himself/herself, I donot think so.

2007-06-22 04:57:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All lawsuits are without the consent of the sued party.

2007-06-22 04:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by energeticthinker 5 · 0 0

The state cannot be sued because it is the one that imposes the law. The only exception is when it enters into a contract where it could be sued when it violated the stipulations of the contract.

2007-06-22 04:50:33 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers