Who cares, frankly I am sure that people are as sick of talking about Barry Bonds as they are of talking about OJ and his lifelong search for Nicoles real killer. If your life is so empty that you have nothing else to talk about I feel sorry for you.
2007-06-22 01:17:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by AngusAssassin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't answer this question. First off we don't know every player that used, so there is no telling who is in the pool with him. Second, do we include all the stats in this discussion or just the ones that occured during the steroid era. If you include Bonds entire career then I would say yes, he is the greatest player of the current steroid era. If you only include stats accumulated while the steroids were being used then I would have to say that Sosa is the better player. You might not agree, but Sosa had more than one monster year like Bonds and more of his stats were accumulated in the years when steroid use was more widespread throughout the game than Bonds did. Is Sosa a better player than Bonds, of course not, but if you take into account only the portion of the career when it appears that they were enhanced Sosa's numbers are better. You can't use the defene and base running argument either, because was just as bad as Sosa during this period of time. You can make an argument either way but lets not forget how dominant Sosa was in the late 90's.
2007-06-21 19:54:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ajn4664_ksu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) How do you know he was on steroids? The evidence seems to indicate that he was, but it's presumptuous to assume that he was.
2) Bonds was a 1st ballot hall of famer long before this steroids thing came out. So how much did they really enhance his career if, in fact, he did take the. What about others. MLB goes to great lengths to ignore the evidence that others were on steroids, focusing only on Bonds. You just know that all George Mitchell will want to know from Giambi is what he knows about Bonds.
3) In answer to your question: No, the greatest steroid enhanced careers would have been those who turned their careers around after likely using them: Brady Anderson,Brett Boone, Lenny Dykstra, Howard Johnson,etc. Unfortunately you'll never hear the media or MLB associate them for alleged steroid use.
2007-06-22 02:34:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by tahoe5284 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barry Bonds no steroids .. what's next, no sillicone on any lady porn stars .. lol .. it is not uncomplicated to declare the place he'd rank between the greats if he hadn't finished steroids or different supplementations because of the fact between those we would learn him to are guaranteed to be some who cheated to a undeniable volume as nicely.
2016-11-07 04:41:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not even Sammy Sosa's steroids and corked bats can match Barry's steroids.
2007-06-21 19:49:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by krumpmaster terrell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok Bonds MIGHT have taken steroids but most players were on steroids in that era but he is clean now and is still hitting them he deserves that record
2007-06-21 21:37:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by SociallyAwkwardPenguin 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
um .... i thought curt schilling was. solo effort it goes to bonds, but dont leave out the dynamic duo the bash bro's! they took some good roids too! every one wants to judge these players though when clearly it is "baseballs" fault. baseball = selig .... right?
2007-06-21 20:29:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by josh_huth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the one under the largest cloud of suspicion. Who knows about the ones that came before him?
2007-06-21 21:23:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pat C 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand the question...
But I guess the anwser is Bonds is byfar the most talented of them all.
2007-06-21 19:43:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by cyril_oreily 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep
And he ranks #1 on the denial o' guilt wheel.
2007-06-21 19:44:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by BillyBob 4
·
1⤊
0⤋