English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-21 14:37:02 · 11 answers · asked by gene_frequency 7 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Remember, I never said evidence of conspiracy nor of terrorists. I just said "evidence."

2007-06-21 15:28:08 · update #1

Thus, if you hurl insults at me based upon your assumption of my intent, you've really told everyone something about yourself.

2007-06-21 15:30:13 · update #2

I'm really appreciating the answers from the thinking types, regardless of which side of the fence. Thanks for your involovment. You few restore my hope.

2007-06-21 15:33:45 · update #3

11 answers

WTC 7

2007-06-21 15:17:34 · answer #1 · answered by celvin 7 · 3 1

The federal government is the damming evidence by not taking proactive steps to stop the attacks when they had prior knowledge that the attacks were imminent. The government should have had all of the homeland security legistlation and the integration of the CIA and the FBI working and sharing information during the Clinton administration.

There's plenty of blame to go around on the 911 issue. No matter how you slice it. Ultimately, the government is responsible for the 911 attacks because there was no accountability or responsiblity prior to the attacks.

It never fails to amaze me that it takes a horrendous tradgic event in order for someone to get up off their duff to something when they should have been doing something in the first place to prevent it from happening.

2007-06-21 22:07:45 · answer #2 · answered by J 4 · 3 3

Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which insights viewers to ask crucial and essential questions.
There can be no doubt; video footage and still photographs need no voice because they speak for themselves. They are incontrovertible evidence of a massive cover-up concerning the events of 9/11. Action is needed and action must be taken – at the polls, in the voting booths, on the street corners, and in your very own living rooms.

2007-06-21 21:48:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7 5

The Muslim extremists flying the planes full of jet fuel into the Twin Towers/Pentagon/field in Pennsylvania at high speed.

2007-06-21 21:42:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Evidence that supports what? The conspiracy theories that say it was orchestrated by the government?

I would say none, all of the evidence is circumstantial at best and not enough to support the argument.

2007-06-21 22:16:29 · answer #5 · answered by greencoke 5 · 1 5

The planes hitting the buildings


jeeze, what a tool.

2007-06-21 22:02:58 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 6 · 3 2

building 7
all buildings falling at free fall speed
the bombs in the sub level floors of all buildings
PNAC
Pentagon videos
eye witness accounts of bombs in the building
the flight 93 hole with no plane
BBC reporting the collapse of building 7, 23 minutes before it did
and so on.. and so on.. and so on....

2007-06-21 22:03:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

In terms of conspiracy theories. None.

2007-06-21 21:40:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 5

The millions of Islamic people, the Islamic street that so wants us out of Iraq, that cheered and celebrated on that day at the deaths of thousands of Americans, dancing in the streets.

2007-06-21 21:49:35 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 3 7

I smell conspiracy theory garbage.

2007-06-21 21:40:39 · answer #10 · answered by Army Retired Guy 5 · 4 5

fedest.com, questions and answers