Maybe Darfur`s industrial complex needs to examined . I mean with all the SUVs` there , and the steel mills running 24/7 , what do you expect ? Gore , where are you ? Solve the global warming BS in Darfur , and you can run for President there , they would certainly welcome a savior like yourself ,and you could count the votes by the short straw method , no hanging chads` there ??
2007-06-22 16:25:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Great Friday question - it made my BSTF meter go off scale (that's a BS tolerance factor meter) but what do you expect from msnbc ??
To answer your question, the other day I was forced to turn a corner too sharply (I drive defensively but we have some *really bad* drivers here) and hit the curb - got TWO flat tires which severely limited my car's ability to complete my travel objective and
- - wait for it - -
I now have *unequivocal* proof that this was caused directly by global warming.
Unfortunately, I can't go into the causative details because the government (which can't plan anything on one hand) has (on the other hand) a fully functional patriot act secret anti-global warming control panel. Where's my aluminum foil ???
Note to Stony - unfortunately, we *can't* support our current state of living because of the scarcity of (and competition for) some of the materials used in making quality steels and tools (see references about moly, chromium, vanadium, etc and environmentalists and China).
Other than that, we're pretty much OK if we go nuclear (thanks for nothing jimmy) and we allow mining of nasty old oil shales.
Note to Tribeca - the attitude is cynical because there is basically no such thing as anthropogenic global warming; please refer to several of my answers in science and mathematics (I did environmental work professionally when I finally had to get involved).
See 'snowball earth' to see your most likely future and the 'abrupt climate change report' to see how long you have to prepare for the big chilly
Note to mr? kevorkian - *absolutely correct* there are areas of the world that just flat out aren't meant to be inhabited all the time (nomadic existence anyone?).
BTW, have you seen the aerial and satellite photos that show that after the sub-Saharan desert advances, it retreats? Cyclically no less, what a surprise !!
and yes, the Darfur problem is complex but might be simplified to - man's interpretation of religion and don't forget to follow the oil money.
Final BTW, I worked with a woman that *felt* the environment was bunnies and fawns; imagine that I reminded her occasionally that snakes, spiders, and coyotes exist and have to eat too. As we used to say in the biz, "Nature is a mean mother."
2007-06-22 17:16:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by xxpat 1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Though neo-pagans and environmentalists have this vision of the earth as a benign, giving mother sort of thing, the truth is that weather patterns are far from dependable over time. Draughts happen, they always have, they probably always will. It doesn't take 'global warming' cause a draught in an arrid region already prone to them.
The problem in Darfur may have some complex and indirect contributing factors, but it still comes down to one group of citizens in a nation deciding that another group of thier fellow citizens has to go.
2007-06-21 17:20:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I see no concern with the link you published. It exhibits countless the alarmism it particularly is going on. seem at your hyperlinks: the BBC, CNN and enormous apple cases have constantly taken an exceedingly professional-agw stance. I opened basically the final one related to the Northwest Passage. The BBC is, as prevalent, very deceptive and incorrect. The NWP isn't open because of the fact of worldwide warming. that is alarmist and exciting for them so say so, even nevertheless that is nonetheless a lie. in fact the NWP opens on occassion and develop into first traversed in 1903 with the help of Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen who sailed via it to the Pacific. The BBC, even nevertheless, develop into very cautious no longer point out this. The does no longer desire to confuse those with info.
2016-10-18 07:36:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by deralin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know that back in the 1970s a group of engineers designed a system to irrigate all of Africa. It has never been implemented because of all the various in-fighting between tribes and countries on that continent.
This is one reason I sometimes think America should just be 100% isolationist. Why bother with the rest of the world and there petty squabbles? We don't need them. America could completely take care of itself AND defend itself without depending on any other nation.
2007-06-21 14:39:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
actually Darfur is responsible for global warming through too many grazing animals leading to desertification of large areas & methane production by the animals
2007-06-21 14:16:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Who Dat ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
People fight over resources – water, oil, etc. You do know, don’t you, that climate change causes droughts? The situation in Darfur is complex. I wonder why you are expressing such a cynical attitude.
2007-06-21 14:21:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Let's send the Global Warming master Al Gore over there to fix everything. He seems to think he has all of the answers.
2007-06-21 14:06:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
"droughts have provoked fighting over water sources"
A basic international relations course will tell you national threats and emergencies cause extreme nationalism. In some cases, like 9/11, that is a good thing. However, more often it leads to war and terrorist types activities.
2007-06-21 14:04:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What are you wearing in your picture by the way?
2007-06-21 14:05:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Yogi B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋