English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now that Bloomberg and Nader are both going to run third party?

Nader went on a scathing attack of hillary, "She is a political coward,” he said. "She goes around pandering to powerful interest groups on the one hand and flattering general audiences on the other.

"She doesn’t even have the minimal political fortitude of her husband.”

Bloomberg is running around the country getting his face out and his feet wet, as well as pulling together big cash right now.

2007-06-21 09:14:37 · 7 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

Didn't Nader run 4 years ago and split the Dem vote then, causing the loss?

I guess this will be a sequel.

2007-06-21 09:28:20 · answer #1 · answered by Karma 6 · 2 1

Nader will not, he will back Bloomberg who will pull GOP votes and help Hillary get elected. The GOP will be destroyed in 2008 because they've foolishly and stubbornly allowed their party to be hijacked by self-absorbed hypocritical idiots. Here is more Proof of Con hypocrisy and stupidity:

Ruth has admitted to being Shrink and most of us know by now that RLP is also Aunt Acid and who knows how many other accounts they have. Ruth likes to say "Libs can't take a joke" yet when images and words from there 360 are put up for all to appreciate in good fun, then it's not so funny - I guess conservatives can't take a joke either. I have news for you all: calling liberals traitors for voicing opposition to a war is shameful and personal and you deserve whatever you get from us in response.

"If we DO NOT JUDGE - we lose the ability to decide what is good and what is evil..." is a direct word-for-word quote from RLP's blog. Ruth told Sister Aimee she didn't agree with that view but I bet she never told RLP that.

One of Sister Aimee's questions was "Do liberals just need a GOOD OLD FASHIONED SPANKING?" Yahoo called it a violation but said nothing when RLP asked the EXACT SAME QUESTION 4 months ago and no one complained. All you cons are PROVEN HYPOCRITES! ROTFLMAO!!

2007-06-21 16:51:20 · answer #2 · answered by Sister Aimee 2 · 0 2

I really don't think it matters. They really don't have any hope now, even before Nader and Bloomberg come in. Besides, once the heavy hitter steps in (Fred Thompson), the Presiedency is sealed for the GOP.

2007-06-21 16:17:53 · answer #3 · answered by mustagme 7 · 4 0

ralph Nader looks more dead now than he did four years ago, is he still alive?? michael Bloomberg has the same problem joe lieberman has, but I admit, they make it more difficult for the democrats.

2007-06-21 16:24:06 · answer #4 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 2 0

Hillary and Obama will be elected. Then we will have 8 more years of Bill Clinton and his never-ending soap opera. It should be amusing to watch those clowns while the country disintegrates around us.

2007-06-21 16:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by connor g 7 · 0 1

dems have no hope for the WH but it is fun to watch them wiggle around like a turtle on it's back.

2007-06-21 16:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They will follow Hillery over the cliff

2007-06-21 16:26:09 · answer #7 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers