Electronic surveillance is ery hard to judge becasue our founding fathers did not conceive of such devices. The dendant gave incrimminating evidence to an informant who was wired, It was upheld because it was felt that talking to the informant was the sae as talking to the informant was the same as talking to the police.
A. rochin v. california
B. chimel v. california
C. on lee v. the united states
D. escobedo v. illinois
2007-06-21 06:50:06 · 6 answers · asked by eeyore_girly17 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
These sites should help you narrow down which case fits the parameters presented in the statement. Good luck (see below)
Rochin v. California
http://www.soc.umn.edu/~samaha/cases/rochin%20v%20california.html
On Lee v. United States
http://helix-web.stanford.edu/people/alain/frash/343US747.html
Chimel v. California
http://www.answers.com/topic/chimel-v-california
Escobedo v. Illinois
http://www.netwalk.com/~thevenue/escobedo.html
2007-06-21 09:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by seraph1818 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is definitely not D. escobedo v. Illinois. Danny Escobedo was being held in the Cook County jail when his lawyer arrive to meet with him. The lawyer was not allowed to consult with Escobedo until just before his scheduled trial. Escobedo claimed that he did not receive a fair trial because he was denied the right to consult with his lawyer in order to help him prepare an adequate defense. The US Supreme Court agreed with Escobedo. I believe that chimel v. california is your answer.
2007-06-24 23:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by johny0802 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Escobedo vs. Illinois
2007-06-21 18:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
D. Is this "YOU" again? I'll figure it out soon enough and will not do your homework for you. Your typing shows you're obviously in a hurry.
2007-06-21 18:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'll need to look up each of these cases ... wish I could help
2007-06-21 08:26:08 · answer #5 · answered by John B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a
2007-06-24 23:03:45 · answer #6 · answered by brenda c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋