English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-21 06:11:46 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

40 answers

Let me think
it is useless to say osam bush media or sadam who is dead
let me tell you when you have power you nickname your enemies to terrorist and friends of terrorist also terrorists
so your confusion must be solved
those who have power they can give you any name they want
and make any thing they want.
so for me every one on power is terrorist

2007-06-21 06:53:23 · answer #1 · answered by chums12000 2 · 0 1

It all depends on your outlook...

Many muslims don't view Osama as a terrorist, they view him as a role model....the same way [some] people in the states view George W. Bush...

According to the "Bush Doctrine" a terrorist is anyone who attempts to install their religious, political, or social beliefs on anyone through the use of force....

With that in mind, ask yourselves who the real terrorists are. Iraqis didn't want a democracy, we "offered" it to them by basically blowing up their country and offering to rebuild it on the condition that they adapt to our form of government.

Saddam was a dictator, but as far as the atrocities he commited go, he's maybe 47th on the list of the top 50 of all time...look at what is going on in Sudan, Rwanda, and all over the rest of the world....yet the US looks away.

I understand the idea behind calling the media terrorists...the only problem with that theory is....you can't turn off a real terrorist..

All in all I think the major factor harming the world today is the lack of education that people have regarding the world around them. We have very much entered into the "if it doesn't hurt me then I don't care" generation and it makes me sick to think that in 20 years my kids will be asking me who Paris Hilton was...because if the trends continue...thats all they will hear about.

2007-06-21 06:29:08 · answer #2 · answered by tajiboy2004 1 · 0 1

Media and Bush are a different kind of terrorist. They sell fear to get ratings and support for bringing terrorism on other lands.

Sadam worked for the CIA. Osama who also worked for the CIA is wanted for terrorist crimes.

2007-06-21 06:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 2 0

The media. The media creates and perpetuates the lies that binds and oppress us in its many formats from the subtlety of reinforcing who the enemy is many films. The Russians have been replaced by the Arabic nations, and the Latinos etc. Peoples of all countries for centuries have gone to war in support of ideologies.... spread by their media. The book is mightier than the sword. TV images are more vivid and can strike a chord in your soul. Damn right, the media is!

2007-06-21 07:48:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Osama and Sadam, even though hes dead

Anyone who suggests that Bush is a terrorist should be shot for stupidity, and their body should be burned. How can you call your own president a terrorist? He's the only one fighting the terrorists!!!!! It shames me that our society has stooped to this level.

As for the media, although they are a bunch of liberal scumbags, and they distort every single story they set eyes on, they are not terrorists, they're just confused

2007-06-21 06:24:13 · answer #5 · answered by blackdiamond1103@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0 4

it's tough..but if u thought about it u'll c that for everyone of those a terrorism side ..like osama when he attacked a lot of ppl and made the islam look bad..and bush when he attacked places like iraq over a reson he made up and sadam by the way he was to his ppl..and the media by making things owrse than ever and make innocent ppl terrorist ppl

2007-06-21 06:18:38 · answer #6 · answered by someone 3 · 0 2

well none of the four would be a terrorist, the media twists the news but that does not make them terrorists, Saddam Hussein was a dictator, Bush is a benevolent President, and Osama is an abomination of a person and a ruler, that lead people to sacrifice themselves, which in fact leads to terrorism, so the closest answer would be A)Osama

2007-06-21 06:19:26 · answer #7 · answered by Jake 2 · 1 3

A C Are TERRORIST THE MEDIA SHOW TO MUCH OF IT IS SADAM AND OSAMA IS THE REASON WHY WE ARE AT WAR BUSH ONLY WENT THERE WHEN THEY CAME ON OUR SOIL AND ATTACKED US

2007-06-21 06:23:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

since as the saying goes: "one man's terrorist is another man's fredom fighter" best to evaluate them on their known criminality.

A) the one who could answer that was John O'Neill -the FBI expert on him, Unfortunately he quit his job because of official obstruction -and died on 9/11 after he took his new job at the WTC- just another 9/11 'coincidence'.

B) wants to tear up the US Constitution, The Geneva Conventions, invades countries on bogus pretexts and was complicit in mass murder on 9/11 and committed treason.

C)A nasty dictator plus a CIA asset for most his life -invaded Iran under their orders - was fooled into thinking that he had US blessing to invade Kuwait - poor judge of friends and suffered for it in the end..

D) complicit in enabling events of A B and C

answer D

2007-06-21 09:22:18 · answer #9 · answered by celvin 7 · 0 0

Bush and the media

2007-06-21 08:53:02 · answer #10 · answered by danor 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers