Ohhh this is an easy one!!
Bridge to Terebithia! Not what the previews made it out to be!
2007-06-21 06:06:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by cls352 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Spiderman 3. I thought it was going to be really good. But no, it sucked. It was like the first BIG summer movie, possibly the last spiderman movie (my guess they'll stop for a while then re-do them eg. batman, superman) and it ended up being very disappointing.
I'll be really pissed if the Harry Potter movie sucks. But the book was good so I'm sure the movie won't be bad.
BTW, I really liked A Thin Red Line. I thought it was better than Saving Private Ryan (they came out around the same time) but SPR got all of the attention because of Speilberg and Hanks. I'm pissed though that much of Adrien Brody's scenes were cut.
2007-06-21 05:14:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lisa K 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Honestly, I'm not generally disappointed to much in movies. If they entertain, they are ok. But, Fantastic Four:Rise Of The Silver Surfer had a disappointing ending. But overall, Superman IV:The Quest For Peace is probably the most disappointing film ever made. Christopher Reeve had a good idea, and they just ruined it with terrible effects and a horrible story.
2007-06-21 05:13:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by vtothef 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Matrix: Revolutions. So much build-up, so much plot and story to tie up...and I left the theater saying "What the f*ck!" They resurrect Trinity in the second movie only to give her a really, really lame death in the third, they foreshadow a huge gigantic battle...only to have the war end in hypocritical diplomacy (Okay, you can keep feeding off humans; just stop trying to kill the ones who are unplugged. We're completely contradicting our own mission, but that's okay because we're alive.)
Not to mention the actual battle in Zion. (The machines are leaving! The war's over! Even though I have no real way of actually knowing this! Let's cheer and yell!) I wish the damn things had gone outside the city, regrouped, and just destroyed their tiny little underground commune.
And they didn't even end the damn movie. They just left it open-ended, in an attempt to "let the audience write their own ending." Weak.
2007-06-21 05:12:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ryan H. 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Basically any horror movie made since 2000, they all are the same thing: some chick screaming for 45 minutes straight and some annoying little girl who makes a buch of prophecies.
2007-06-21 05:18:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by cold 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pirates of the Carribean!!! I think I am the only person who was not excited that they chose to make it a trilogy. I thought the first installment was okay. Nothing great. Didn't think there was a need to drag us through two more movies.
2007-06-21 05:37:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by jsvalentine73 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I consider diverse your "suitable" yet I disagree with a number of your "disappointing" too. suitable: Kick-*** (My New popular action picture) Machete Scott Pilgrim Vs. the international Toy tale 3 warm tub Time gadget Inception the different adult males Dinner For Schmucks Shutter Island Worst/Disappointing ROBIN HOOD. That action picture develop into uninteresting *** hell.
2016-10-18 06:18:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by contino 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Open Water sucked bad! So did Blair Witch Project. So did the village.
2007-06-21 07:26:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lisa T (Stop BSL) 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Recently it was "Spiderman 3." Before that, I would say "Munich." I must've been having a slow-brain day, 'cause I couldn't understand a single thing that was going on in that movie.
And I agree with Ryan H. about "Matrix Revolutions." What the hell were they thinking?
2007-06-21 05:15:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by theoryparker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Date Movie. I was told that it was hilarious and just plain great. Well I was expecting to be falling out of my chair of laughter. Don't get me wrong it had funny parts, but the movie was just disappointing and not that funny.
2007-06-21 05:08:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by imart 2
·
1⤊
0⤋