It's not creative at all, he stole the ideas and characters from the Wizard of Oz series. That's just lazy.
2007-06-21 04:23:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I mean, look at the story it's based off of: you've got the Cowardly Lion, the Scarecrow, and the Tinman.
It's a really depressing book. I liked the musical a lot more becuase it 1. was less confusing 2. had more Fiyero 3. had amazing music. Check it out after you finish Wicked. Then go read Son of a Witch and tell me if it's any good.
2007-06-21 12:35:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by luna_lovegood 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hehe. It wasn't creative, but I don't think it was supposed to be. I mean, Nanny was a nanny, and servants and slaves in that time didn't get creative names. As for Turtle Heart, his name was something else, but translated into that in their language.
I love the book.
2007-06-21 11:25:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Music. Is. Pride. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I feel ya. It's a great book. I just tried to focus on the stuff that he really put is imagination to use for in this book. But to be honest, I can NEVER watch the Wizard of OZ and see it the same again.
Hope you enjoy. Try to catch the Broadway version, too.
2007-06-21 11:26:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Oberon 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Love everything about the book and play. Read 'Son of a Witch" when you are done.
2007-06-21 11:23:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥ Etheria ♥ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yea i no but it is still the best book ever u should see the musical! yea they took the names from the oz series because its the before story !
2007-06-21 11:23:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by mirrioronthedoor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he meant it to be like that. I don't know maybe there's some hidden meaning or something. It's a great book though.
2007-06-21 11:37:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Meggie Beth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
see the musical. :)
2007-06-21 11:24:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by ejln c 3
·
0⤊
1⤋