Aside from the smart-A remarks here by the usual gaggle of wacko right-wingers, one fact appears to have been overlooked: the two men despise each other.
2007-06-21 03:44:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
With a 29% aapproval rating and an amendment to the Constitution prohibiting it, Bush has a better chance of winning a third term, than Kennedy/Carter have of being elected.
2007-06-21 03:12:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by gerafalop 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Carter could be president in that he only served one term. Boy this would be a Republican dream ticket to run against. To really be able to show the damage Jimine has done to us internationally with his kissing terrorists around the world and to show how Teddy is out of touch with reality from all the days of drinking, they only reason he still gets elected in Massachusetts is they forget what year it is and are so used to voting Kennedy that they would break their finger to move to another switch in the ballot booth.
2007-06-21 06:37:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure Carter could be VP and since he only served one term before Americans woke up he could be President.
But I think that would be great ticket.
A drunk and a delusional old man
2007-06-21 03:13:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by David's Roast - Fuji Master 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are mistaken. Carter, having been president, cannot be vice president. Secondly those two distinguished statesmen are a bit on the elderly side. Although their experience and wisdom is valuable to those of younger age it is best they not run for president.
2007-06-21 03:24:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jimmy Carter would have higher standards than that.
2007-06-21 03:15:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I have a better chance to have the real Cicero come back to life, visit me with Bill Gates and Gates gives me his fortune.
2007-06-21 03:08:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
All valid factors ! although ; don`t forget approximately the Liberal Socialist Mantra " DO AS I , SAY no longer AS I DO " ? isn't any one curious related to the certainty that the Liberal Democrats have been undesirable mouthing our American well-being care equipment for the final decade or longer ? I`m specific you may pull up infinite You Tube movies of each democrat in Congress and see and hear them pummel united states of america well-being care equipment , and boasting that our well-being care equipment isn`t as stable as different countries "Socialized well-being care equipment" , no longer whilst stable as Cuba`s as that liberal deranged lunatic Michael Moore tried to portray , alongside with something of the liberal socialist bias` media as they ran specific`s approximately it ! So after all the raping of our well-being care equipment by utilising the liberals` , why didn`t they condemn Kennedy for unlikely to that haven of greater effective well-being care called Cuba ? Why didn`t Kennedy refuse to be dealt with by utilising the very docs` he has blatantly degraded ? Why didn`t the liberals` upward push up for their so called "thoughts" of " there`s greater appropriate well-being in different countries ". ya` know why ? because of the fact whilst the scalpel hit`s the surgeons hand , even the Liberal condemners of united states of america`s well-being care equipment decide to work out an American flag patch on the docs lapel , and that they dam specific decide to have their rights study to them in ENGLISH !!!! for that reason ; Liberals practice to themselves that they themselves don`t have self belief in what they tell the universal public to have self belief , consequently proving to themselves they are liars to the max !
2016-11-07 02:57:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, what a winning team that would be! They have a show on TV about them don't they? The biggest loser?
2007-06-21 03:08:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by booman17 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not me but I'm sure the Republicans would love it.
2007-06-21 03:09:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by CHARITY G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋