what further proof do you need that things are not looking good for GOP?
2007-06-21 02:49:15 · 17 answers · asked by Ronnie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Excellent point!
I don't know how the Republican party can make anyone look better in the first place.
If keeping things the same, not improving the planet, or medical research, or not helping the poor and homeless in order to "feed" a senseless war, or not giving people the right to choose is good for one's image...what is so redeeming about being a Republican?
2007-06-21 02:56:06 · answer #1 · answered by joe_on_drums 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bloomberg is confused. For a man who has amassed the wealth he has one would think he could afford a better education or something. First he is a Democrat and then a Republican and now he is independant? Good grief! Aren't guys like him supposed to be good at making decisions? He obviously can't decide what he wants to go with philosophically. If he were to run for president one can wonder what other indecisiveness would he show.
At least Dubya is a decider, usually wrong, but decider nevertheless.
2007-06-21 03:17:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bloomberg's a party hopper. He does what is most advantageous, he switched from Democrat to Republican to get on mayoral ticket in NY.
2007-06-21 02:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
develop into he ever interior the republican celebration? he's a wealthy liberal at heart! he's a Kennedy to-the-center! We conservatives verify along with his ilk as being a RINO (stated like rhyno) - Republican In call basically. those are people who desire to recommend themselves as republicans for in spite of reason - it particularly is all. possibly, whilst he ran for the governorship of massive apple, he felt that it would artwork against him if he have been to approach the election as a democratic candidate as against the guy who basically left - Rudy. some human beings conservatives have additionally categorized Rudy as a RINO with the aid of him refusing to incorporate center conservative subject concerns: precise-to-life for innocents and 2nd-modification rights. those are center conservative subject concerns, in spite of what the goons interior the media permit you already know.
2016-10-18 06:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
did you say this when jumpin' jim jeffords left the democrats?...i didnt think so...and just so you know, bloomberg went from being a lifelong democrat to a temporary republican in order to win the mayorship of new york and now he is switching party affiliations again so that he can run for president as an independent...jeez you partisan hacks are a dimwitted bunch aren't you?......
2007-06-21 02:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bloomberg was always a democrat at heart. I would take this more of a sign of political opportunism.
Ron Paul 2008
2007-06-21 02:52:38 · answer #6 · answered by Layne B 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The fact he originally left the Democratic party to improve his image is proof enough I guess.
2007-06-21 02:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by wizjp 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Don't forget that he left the Democrats first 8 years ago. So it's not like they're all high and mighty, and notice he didn't go back either.
2007-06-21 02:52:00 · answer #8 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The reality is, Bush has tarnished the party's image so badly that I think we're going to see more and more high profile defections running up to the election.
2007-06-21 02:52:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Consider he left the Dems for the GOP, WHAT DOES THAT SAY ALSO.
2007-06-21 02:54:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋