2007-06-21 02:19:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It looks like some folks are missing the point. Since the right calls the media left biased the questioner is pointing out that if the media is so liberally biased than why did the Washington Post pursue the Clinton scandal so fervently? Washington Post, if anyone reads their articles, is in no way libral biased. If anything it is very much biased toward the right. It was obvious in the 1990s and is obvious today.
So when a rightie says, in a general sense, liberal media they obviously are not including Fox or the Washington Post or several other media outlets. They are including only those who refuse to walk in lockstep with their fearless leader.
2007-06-21 02:58:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please post some examples of the "liberal bias" used by the Washington Post in the Clinton White House Scandals (and what does that ever refer to)?
Learn to cite your sources genius or else people will just thinki you're making stuff up.
2007-06-21 02:36:17 · answer #2 · answered by jebul 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good element, there are various examples of this way of element each and all of the time. greater, Fabian grow to be an imperative extreme-score member of Romney's marketing campaign team, on an analogous time as Hsu grow to be basically a donor to Hillary. anybody with a modicum of impartiality would end that the Romney scandal is plenty greater severe. Given the hundreds of donors to any presidential compaign, it rather is not mind-blowing that some become crooks, yet Romney quickly positioned his have faith in a thief. style of jogs my memory of Giuliani and his help for Bernard Kerik as place of beginning risk-free practices Czar. severe lapses of judgment.
2016-10-02 21:19:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the liberal media have been mucking up this country from day one. It's time to end freedom of the press so "true patriots" have a chance to hide what it is they are doing.
:) Great question.
2007-06-21 02:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't know. I have never read the Washington Post.
2007-06-21 02:28:00 · answer #5 · answered by Brian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, they just couldn't down-play such an embarrassment of having our President facing an impeachment due to a sex scandal...it's just too good.
2007-06-21 02:33:13 · answer #6 · answered by Granny Gruntz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
where was the liberal bias?
demonizing Ken Starr, Paula Jones
not reporting it would have cheated themselves out of the chance to say penis .as much as they like.
2007-06-21 02:34:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure, if 24/7 minute to minute coverage is what you call 'intensely'.
2007-06-21 02:28:33 · answer #8 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We use the liberal "Washington Compost" as toilet paper at our house
2007-06-21 02:29:13 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-06-21 02:30:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋