English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ie,wasps,freemasons,skull and bones.i have asked a similer question before and did not get much feedback?

2007-06-21 00:32:59 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

No, they aren't elected officials and have no real power. If there is inside influence that is exposed it would be corruption that needs to be nipped in the bud. I would call it treason.

2007-06-21 01:29:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

The reason you didn't get much feedback is because the question is too ambiguious. And if it's a really secret organization how would you know if they were members?

Wasp isn't a secret organization. It's an acronym for white anglo-saxon protestant. Freemasons don't hide their membership only their rights of initiation, nor do skull and bones. The KKK has many members and past members in the Democrat party but they don't want you to know about it.

WOOOOO that 'Secret Society' thing is SOOOOO scary. What happens behind closed doors in Congress fits. The members are public but what they do isn't. It's so secret even the people voting on stuff don't know everything there is to know about what they are voting for. Now that is scary.

Take a few minutes and think about all the things 'people in power' do in government that you don't know about and rewrite the question.

2007-06-21 02:06:46 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1 3

Strange you should ask after I have just watched a programme on the influence of the Freemasons on the dollar bill. All sounds very suspicious to me although it concluded that nothing could be proved one way or another.
There have been 14 past Presidents of the USA who were members.
I suppose as long as they declare their allegiances to these various societies its OK. Its secrecy that causes concern and doubt.

2007-06-21 00:59:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

surely the concept of a secret society must be at odds with an open society?
One of the main functions of secret societies is a mutually beneficial to its members. but if some of those members are in important positions of trust this should be looked at.

The fact that they aren't proscribed is in itself an indication of the amount of power and influence they have.

2007-06-21 12:41:45 · answer #4 · answered by celvin 7 · 0 0

If the organisation the person in power belongs to is secret, how would anyone that did not belong to the organisation know the powerful person belonged to it? I am sorry to answer with a question but that could be why you did not get much response before.
In an ideal world people in powerful positions in government should not belong to some secret society/organisation, but how is it to be policed? We could never be 100% certain the secret organisation was being open.

2007-06-21 00:40:39 · answer #5 · answered by Jim 5 · 3 3

i will basically extremely talk of Freemasonry, which isn't secret seeing as you already know of them, their homes are particularly evidently marked, their individuals are indexed in 12 months books and their assembly cases, dates and places are loose for public viewing??? with connection with political ability, none. Freemasons, whilst in touch with something to do with Freemasonry (assembly, journey, social masonic amassing) can't talk politics, so it would be annoying to deliver mutually political help for something, no longer to show something in the kind of scheme as a countries rules. somebody guy has the perfect to be in touch in something he chooses, as long as that's legal and ethical (are politicians ethical lol ) yet what they do as somebody isn't Freemasonry and does not point out a view of Freemasonry. hyperlinks to occult, dollar bill, historic figures, modern-day celebs and so on might make this answer too long yet I certainly have replied all of those until now so in case you desire to have answer please view a number of my earlier responses with the help of potential of my profile, or message me promptly and that i visit delighted to ellaborate further.

2016-10-18 05:52:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

- WASP is not a secret organization but...

- Most Freemasons are for democracy. Freemasons helped democracy to grow up and many politicians (here in France) of many parties are Freemason (all depends in which lodge they are, but most are for democracy and are pluralistic). I do not think this is really a problem, but I may be wrong.

- George Bush Sr was said to be a member of "skull and bones" some say that his father and his son George Walker were members of this organization too...

You forget in your list religious organizations as :

- evangelistic new born christian (protestant)

- Opus dei (catholic)

- probably many others

Sects as

- Moonists

- Scientologists

- many others

You forgot also unproven existent organizations as Illuminati and terrorist organizations as KKK.

Many politicians in power are approached or are actually members of these organizations.

2007-06-21 01:22:34 · answer #7 · answered by Sérendipité 3 · 1 4

Dubya, Busche Sr., and John Kerry, are All MEMBERS of The SKULL and BONES SOCIETY,.... Along with The MAJORITY of Boosche Staff/Cabinet/Advisors, Most being Ashkenazi Zionistt Communist/Marxist Israeli Jews, like Perle, Paul "the Scumbag" Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Frumm, Zelikow, Bolton, Feith, William" The Flamer"Kristol, Zoellick, Fleisher Bros, Richard Haass, Gaffney, Pipes, and assorted other SEWER RATS. if that isn't enough, you can throw in the Nazi/Fascist Connection, like Herr Karl"with a K" Von Rove, Herr DonHeinrich Von RumsfeldenHauser, with a few NWO/ILLUMINATI/PNAC/ElitistHomosestuals, Greedy Globalist Madmen and which is a Sure recipie for Extinction .. This Country-Worlds ONLY Hope Just May Be in the Likes of Dr.Ron Paul, Senator Jim Webb, maybe unders like Gravel, Kucinich, Congressman Tim/Tom? Ryan, Aaron Russo, Olbermann etc. ... http://skullandcrossbones.org/articles/skullandbones-yale.htm .. http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm

2007-06-21 00:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

If by 'secret' you mean 'proscribed' organisations - one man's proscribed group is another man's civil rights movement. For instance, Nelson Mandela's party, the ANC, was once banned in South Africa.

Some of our best leaders in the six are said to belong to such groups. Doesn't mean, of course, that they do...

2007-06-21 05:39:29 · answer #9 · answered by gortamor 4 · 0 2

I think that people in power tend to belong to secret organizations, which is a completely different concept from what you asked.

I think it's inevitable, and therefore irrelevant whether I think it SHOULD be that way or not.

Did you see "The Good Shepherd?" Lots of Skull and Bones references there. "Bonesmen first, God second."

2007-06-21 00:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7 · 3 3

Every organisation has its secrets, including governments and their departments.

The moral and ethical question that secrecy poses for democracy is to what extent that secrecy is undermining individual freedoms and how does that secrecy harm people?

Some secrets are necessary, even essential to protect people from harm. Other secrets are necessary to protect people's reputations. We have secret ballots when voting to protect people's identity from recriminations, and secrets to protect the privacy of individuals.

While transparency and accountability are the best formulas for promoting public confidence in public institutions, we must understand that secrecy has its place.

2007-06-21 00:42:48 · answer #11 · answered by Big B 6 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers