Most British main line locomotives of the 1960's and 1970's could manage almost 1 mpg average. This would typically be pulling 400 tons at up to 90mph.
Deisel multiple units would manage anything up to 12 mpg or more.
These days the modern trains have far more fuel-efficient engines but they also have all manner of electronic equipment and air conditioning, power doors, super bright lighting etc. to run. It's probably still more than 1 mpg but not as much as we would hope.
The Canadian built EWS freight locos are also very thirsty beasts.
Having said that, their pollution emissions are far better than they used to be.
PS I mean Imperial gallons, not the smaller US variety.
2007-06-21 09:57:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A UK train with six carriages will use between 1.5 to 2 gallons of fuel per mile. Given it could be carrying 300 people thats not bad even at two gallons.
For example a car travelling 100 miles at 33 miles per gallon would take 3 gallons to move one person 100 miles.
On a train it would take 200 gallons at two miles per gallon to transport 300 people which works out it would take two thirds of a gallon to move one perso 100 miles.
So a train is four and a half times more fuel efficient than a car.
2007-06-21 07:57:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by cedley1969 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The formula is 'Ton Miles Per Gallon' of fuel. This of course is widely variable and there is no set answer.
But, your older GE and EMD engines will burn up 196 gallons of fuel per hour, at full rack (run 8, full power).
Newer, more fuel efficient models, have cut this by a significant amount to around 160 gallons per hour.
Most locomotives are equipped with a 4,200 gallon fuel tank, and this is usually enough to cover 1,000 miles on the older equipment.
It goes without saying that the most fuel is burned when accelerating the train up to speed. Once at that point, a much lower throttle position can keep the tonnage rolling well.
2007-06-21 06:57:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Samurai Hoghead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think about 200 tonne miles per gallon is a ballpark figure,
Automobiles manage 20 tonne miles per gallon as a ballpark , like 1960 Mini 1/2 Tonne 40mpg, Range Rover 3 Tonne 13 mpg.
2007-06-21 00:02:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Affectionately called "Marvellous Melbourne" through the silver hurry of the 1850s, the name continues to be used nowadays for Australia's next largest town Melbourne, a town as possible visited with hotelbye . On the banks of the Yarra River, near the entrance to Port Phillip Bay, Melbourne is a modern metropolis steeped in history. With huge wealth made from the nearby goldfields, majestic structures were created throughout the city. A number of these houses still stay nowadays, and Melbourne is regarded as having more samples of Victorian architecture than some other city in Australia. One place you cannot miss in your stop by at Melbourne may be the Southbank and Arts Centre Melbourne. On the banks of the Yarra River this area is a culturally rich appeal for visitors. Southbank promenade is filled with indoor/outdoor cafés, restaurants, and live entertainment. Easily identifiable by their spire, the Arts Centre includes a range of theaters and spots such as the State Theatre, Playhouse, Fairfax Theatre, and Hamer Hall, the premier performance space for the revered Melbourne Symphony Orchestra.
2016-12-23 00:37:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An Australian NR class locomotive http://locopage.railpage.org.au/sra/pn_nr.html
hauling 1300 tonnes will use 11,500 litres of diesel on the 852 mile trip between Melbourne and Brisbane which equates to 3.56 US gallons per mile or 2.96 Imperial gallons per mile.
2007-06-21 00:08:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Del Piero 10 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Freight Train Mpg
2016-12-18 14:54:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or even how many gallons in an hour!
It has to vary - depends what its pulling, whether its at standstill, speed it runs at.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6564172.html
Interesting article there - but I don't think it gives actual fuel usage.
2007-06-20 23:51:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sal*UK 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Surely that should be "how many gallons to a mile".
2007-06-20 23:48:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It depends on weather or not there climbing hills or not. it also depends on the load it is hauling. In any case not very much!
2007-06-20 23:50:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by rklee0122 4
·
0⤊
0⤋