English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-20 21:16:07 · 2 answers · asked by kanishk jain 1 in Politics & Government Military

2 answers

SEE IT SPREAD BY THE HARDCORE RELIGIOUS LEADER OF CERTAIN RELIGIONS. THEY DO NOT WANT THE PEACE IN THE WORLD. IT IS SUPPORTED BY THE SOME POLITICAL PARTIES AND ARMY OF THE CERTAIN NATION WHICH ARE UNDEVELOPED ON THE MAP OF THE WORLD. SOME WORLD POWER IS ALSO INVOLVED IN IT TO PRESSURISE THE INFLUENCE IN CERTAIN COUNTRIES. THOUGH IT IS NOT GOOD FOR THE WORLD AND PEACEFUL NATION. BUT WHEN INTERESTS OF SOME COUNTRIES INVOLVE IN ITS YOU CANNOT CONTROL IT. THOUGH IN UNITED NATION ALL THE NATION VOICE AGAINST THE TERRORISM BUT INTERNALLY SOME THEM SUPPORT FROM THE BACK DOORS. TILL THAT ALL THE NATION HONESTLY WILL NOT OPPOSE THIS DECEASE WE CANNOT CONTROL OVER THE TERRORISM.

2007-06-23 02:53:23 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 1 0

The August bombings of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania left an indelible impression that we are facing a worsening threat of terrorism. When we see the images of crumbled buildings shrouded in smoke and battered, bloody victims crawling to safety from the rubble it is no surprise that Americans feel vulnerable and helpless. These events have reopened the wounds left in our national psyche from the 1995 bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

Shortly after the bombings in East Africa, we learned that the US Ambassador to Kenya had made two requests for funds to upgrade inadequate Embassy security. In a classic example of closing the barn door after the horse escaped, the United States Department of State is now requesting the funds from Congress to fully implement security measures recommended in 1985 by the Advisory Panel on Overseas Security, convened in the aftermath of an attack on the US Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon.

Naturally, many security professionals are re-examining whether their companies or clients are doing enough to defeat the threat of terrorism. Assessing the threat has been made more difficult because there is substantial public rhetoric claiming the threat is worsening. If this is true then additional security measures and expanded security programs are in order.

However, if you look past the rhetoric and the slanted news coverage, a dramatically different picture of the threat emerges.

Terrorism is not widespread.
Terrorist groups are not proliferating at an uncontrollable rate.
Terrorism has and can be contained.

2007-06-21 05:08:35 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers