Yes after with 1-3 degree increase in the next 1500 centuries, we should start hoarding perishables to prepare for the worst like Y2K. Rediculous. My mom is still using the wheat and rice we got Nov. 1999! I'm embarrassed to say after I told her she is overracting way to much.
2007-06-20 10:55:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment ➔ Global Warming
It'd be much easier for him to build a blimp since he's already full of so much hot air.
2007-06-20 11:02:44 · answer #1 · answered by Andy S 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Goodness! Aren't you well-informed! Oh, by the way - "rediculous" isn't a word. And, 1500 centuries from now will not be the year 3587 - that will be 15.8 centuries from now. So, considering your lack of any credible, useful intelligence, I think I'd rather go with Al Gore. Why do stupid people ask such stupid questions?? -RKO- 06/20/07
2007-06-20 12:12:50 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure what your sources are but they're not reliable.
All credible indications are that we'll see a rise of 1 to 3 degrees (Celsius) within the next century. This won't cause dramatic sea level rises but they will continue rising and a rise of about 500 to 600mm is expected by the turn of the century - not enough to warrant building an ark.
2007-06-20 11:03:32 · answer #3 · answered by Trevor 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
bear in techniques considered one of those DREK the subsequent you pay attention the republicorps whining approximately every person talking approximately sara palin. al gore has no longer been in politics for TWELVE years. however the perfect wing noise gadget keeps coming up with this shite as though right here have been actively in politics. al gore is a private citizen who has no longer been promptly in touch in politics when you consider that 1999. what's with the republicorps and al gore. why are they so deathly petrified of this guy?
2016-10-18 04:37:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably won't call it an Ark seeing as he is anti-religion. He probably doesn't even believe in the Bible, much less the great Flood. But then again, an Ark would suit his purpose just fine, no running water, no electricity, no engines, and full of animals and trees he can hug. Very environmentally friendly, unlike his own house now.
2007-06-20 11:04:44 · answer #5 · answered by Adrian Hill 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He can't even check the oil in his Hummer! What makes you think he could build anything except his ego and bank account? "Global warming" is a non-problem just like Y2K and the 'new ice age' of the '70s.
2007-06-20 11:16:58 · answer #6 · answered by ideamanbmg 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd suggest that he spend his time building an indestructible bunker inside a mountain - he'll need it once all the sheeple realize that they've been had.
2007-06-20 11:24:40 · answer #7 · answered by 3DM 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
this question is so dumb, if hes still alive in 3587 he would finally deserve to be president
2007-06-20 14:06:01 · answer #8 · answered by cameron greene 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, he already acts like he's God...
2007-06-20 12:19:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he will already have died...
2007-06-20 18:49:50 · answer #10 · answered by skateboardboi 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋