Seriously? Power helps a lot, but it is the better defensive fighter and the faster handed fighter that has the distinct advantages.
Also, the straighter-punching fighter gets his shots in faster, which is important especially in later rounds when both boxers tire.
2007-06-20 10:54:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the one who is smart enough to know his own strength and weakness and use them to his advantage.
There have been so many large fighters who never used their size and ability to their advantage, like those who don't use the jab effectively or cut off the ring against small and quicker fighters. Then you have smaller fighters who perhaps wrongfully try to trade shots with the bigger man, like Chris Bryd tried to do against Wladamir Klitschko. He definitely didn't fight smart.
2007-06-20 17:21:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Woody 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to go with the big one cause if the guy is smaller he is gonna get a lot of hard shots hit down on him like in the head. but hey thats just me.
2007-06-20 17:17:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
is this question for real? which advantage could take a smaller and weaker person?
2007-06-20 17:22:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by El Viejo Pantera 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The one with the skill to beat the crap out of the other usually.
2007-06-20 17:14:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you cant figure this out then I think you lack some common sense.
2007-06-20 17:23:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by mitchell b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The "smart" one wins... which means you would lose every time...
2007-06-20 17:15:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kiowa1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋