English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was in an accident over a month ago that was not my fault. I am wondering if it is possible to receive compensation for being without a car?

2007-06-20 02:15:08 · 10 answers · asked by rache6987 2 in Cars & Transportation Insurance & Registration

10 answers

If the other person had insurance and was found to be at fault they should pay for a rental car until your car is fixed or they give you a check for the replacement value of your car.

If they do not have insurance and you have uninsired motorist and rental, your insurance company shouldpay for a rental car. It is usually limited to an amount per day though.

2007-06-20 02:20:54 · answer #1 · answered by randomcobweb 3 · 0 0

To a certain point. The at fault party (when they eventually accept) are responsible for covering your rental when repairs are being done on your car. Now.. as fair as them covering it while they investigate the claim.. thats a little more iffy.. usually they will cover about a week or so if you get in one out of pocket... but.. if youve received at "mitigate your damages" letter... your out of luck. That letter basically means "were investigating.. were not covering your rental righ tnow.. you need to go through your carrier"

Loss of use.... (which means getting paid for not having a rental) is iffy as well. Some companies will make you provide proof that you used money b/c you didnt have a car (aka.. taxi receipts.. bus receipts... etc) b/c really.. thats all they owe you for.

Others will give you 15 or so bucks a day for a reasonable amount of days (again.. probalby not a whole month.. they dont owe that b/c they are still investigating)

2007-06-20 02:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This gentleman could be a rip-off artist, or ignorant, or the two. Your thoughts contain * Get sufficient information from him so which you would be able to call your coverage company and discover out what grew to become into the disposition of the coincidence case. this is that the police ruled the coincidence grew to become into no longer your Dad's fault, so which you do no longer owe the different occasion a dime, or this is that the coverage company did pay the declare, and this gentleman is claiming something in a strategies greater effective than what's genuine looking. * tell the gentleman which you should forget approximately approximately his please because of the fact you have self belief him to be a criminal, and if he maintains to pester you, you will checklist him to the lawyer universal of the state because of the fact you have self belief that what he's doing is prohibited. * tell the gentleman what you know of the regulation and coverage in such situations, which contains the certainty which you do no longer owe him a dime, except he can practice that he has costs incurred because of the fact it grew to become into your Dad's fault, and that your Dad's coverage did no longer pay those costs. you surely ought to talk with your coverage company approximately this because of the fact you haven't any longer any concept what they already paid him, if he did no longer checklist the fees precise, if your Dad's coverage grew to become into inadequate to the area, what the police checklist reported.

2016-11-07 00:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by bojan 4 · 0 0

Most insurers have an allowance for a rental car, and you can try to go against the person at-fault for "loss of use".

2007-06-20 02:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by JeffyB 7 · 0 0

If your crossing a street and a car hit you and had suffered an injury the other party's insurance will compensate you. Not for being without a car but for bodily harm.

2007-06-20 02:34:24 · answer #5 · answered by Mon 1 · 0 2

If you have insurance & have uninsured driver coverage you should just let your insurance company handle every thing.

Thats what you have insurance for.

If you or the other driver have no insurance you have to go to court to get money from the other party.

Thats what lawyers are there for.

If some one is at fault & causes damages to you you have the right to be compensated. But you or the insurance company need to go after the person at fault.

2007-06-20 02:30:43 · answer #6 · answered by Floyd B 5 · 0 2

If your policy allows for rental of a car, then you can do that. Otherwise, no compensation.

2007-06-20 16:19:12 · answer #7 · answered by fisherwoman 6 · 0 0

Yes, it's called a rental car. The other drivers' insurance will pay for one.

2007-06-20 02:19:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you could potentially get what the estimated amount would be to rent a car of the same caliber for the time frame that you were without a car.

2007-06-20 02:19:52 · answer #9 · answered by Yes I am here!! 5 · 0 0

call a lawyer and find out for sure

2007-06-23 11:51:22 · answer #10 · answered by cheri h 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers