if we evolved from fishes, according to evolution, can we evolve to become birds next?

Question

if we evolved from fishes, according to evolution, can we evolve to become birds next?

would that take BILLIONS OF YEARS again, such that NO ONE HERE would be able to witness it AGAIN?

cna you guys imagine bbillions of years later, we have become birds and we are telling our children that we were once apes...... isn't all this evolution crap a bit too childish? it is as if its straight from a CARTOON!

haha!

yea.. i wont believe in a fantasy like evolution.

fish to ape, ape to man, man to birds, birds to crabs, crabs to ants, ants to trees, trees to islands?

anything is possible right? HAHAHAHA!

yea st louis, im your evil twin. and im not believing in a fantasy like evolution. maybe they are gonna tell us we came from grass the next time round.

im not gonna SWALLOW that!

Answer 1

Hahahahahaha LOL.....oooooh my.....Are you my evil twin???
When I can collect myself and stop laughing I do have a response....Oh yeah...if we evolved from apes why are there still apes?....I know the evolutionist will anwer with "no we share the same ancestors with apes"....that is not what the evolution books teach....isn't it also true we as Humans have "theoretically" stopped evolving???....Oh come on...you are correct Evolution is a bunch of nonsense crap.

Answer 2

I do not really care if you believe it or not.

The fossils are there.
Fish > amphibian > reptile > mammal > primate > human.

You can close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and shout IS NOT! It will not make them go away.


Could we become birds? No. Birds already exist having evolved from dinosaurs.

Could we become a creature that flies? Well we would have to get a lot smaller to cope with the laws of physics - which means that we lose our evolutionary advantage of our big brains, but it could be possible.

Yes it would take millions of years. Why does that make it unbelievable?

If you think that evolution is untrue answer this:
New species have occurred. For example here is a bacteria that ingests a material that never existed before the 1930s:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nylonase

Now, if you say that that is just micro evolution, then please tell me what is the mechanism that stops evolution from making lots of little changes over time that end up being a big change from the original?

This is like saying it is O.K for me to walk 10 yards step after step, but it is totally impossible for me to walk 20 miles in the same way.

At least think about this. It might encourage you to actually learn about evolution as it really is, rather than the strawman you have created to simply knock down.

Answer 3

Althought you are being harrassed a great deal from your question, i understand your points to the fullest.

I personally, do not belive in Creationism, or God, Or evolution.
The whole Evolution thing could have an effect on animals to a particular degree, with size and color, such has Dark moths dying in a light environment so now the moths are all light. But to transform into another animal? yeah.... highly unlikely as the Genes don't Change when you have a Child. It'll always be the animal you are. no matter what happened to you. it won't be "slightly different based on your experiences" or anything ridiculous like that.

Althought evolution has more feet to stand on than Creationism, it's still.....highly unlikely. Yet not as impossible as God. If we went through time and i saw evolution at hand i would be like "oh well what do you know" i wouldn't be Baffled and amazed. like if i found out God was real or something. which would be more like a, Well *************** that is crazy!

but yeah. we probably won't be changing at all ever, we just get bigger because we have proper nutrition and care for ourselves to grow to our fullest extent...thats probably about it.

Answer 4

I'm gona make this easy Charley Darwin documented every species from amoeba to vertebrates but didn't say nish about our UFOs we cant catch and stuff that OH leave it we don't need it
the world was apparently flat an square mean this guy didn't even have Internet access and it was the doctrines validated by such men that let to the systematic killing and cataloging of humman bones [skeletons in closets which i have seen]which in turn led to the criteria applied genocidal assault on Jews Africans Americans Australians so some sweaty old fart helped the empier and finding truth is like picking peas out of poop we are alive after eons off bull lets have a party and maybe our brains will do the evolving

Answer 5

Actually, sir, it wasn't "fishes" from which all life on Earth evolved but teeny worm-like crawly things in the sea. Birds? No. We are pretty-much stuck where we now are, primates, but, if our species survives, in a couple thousand years, human brains are apt to be bigger (and better used), and hearts healthier, eyes sharper, and this and that. Computers, medical science, stem cells, diet, bad air for this or that reason--these things will affect us. Education, global communications. Weather too. Excessive heat, more and greater hurricanes. Parts of the human body that are little used, or of no use to us, will depart from us. Nuclear exchanges, shifts in government systems. In the USA and Western Europe, a loss of democracy, of individual freedoms. Evolution, Whether or not some folks deny it. All this is only a little bit the evolving ahead. Note I said "if" our species survives for even a thousand years much less two. It's iffy.

Answer 6

I'm not sure if I have this quite straight, but I'm sure some science type will come behind me and correct me, so here goes.
The way I (mis)understand it is that, somehow, we skipped through the lizard to bird stage, by evolving into a rodent type of critter...the first mammal. From that inglorious little rat come all the mammals we have today. Somewhere along the line, one branch of the family took to the trees...or maybe they climbed up a branch and it grew into a tree, I'm not quite sure...but anyway, that branch blossomed out into ape-like critters. Then, some of the apes decided they didn't like it up in the trees, and decided to come down and evolve into people.
Of course, I may not have gotten the sequence quite right...there do seem to be some gaps in the tail...or should I say, tale...but then, there are some missing links in the chain, as well.
Can I go get a glass of water now?
God bless!!

Answer 7

amphibians to man is evolution,
man to bird is devolution,

evolution happens due to the change in the environment.
It makes a species to better cope up with the change.

Therefore only evolution can happen not devolution.

If birds were to come, then everything should repeat again from the beginning.

consider the fact that humans rule over the world and not birds(who wants to have bird brains). At present

Answer 8

Well, actually as I understand it...

The first multi-cellular organisms came from the ocean, and eventually evolved to fish. The fish eventually evolved to amphibians, who evolved into lizards, who evolved into birds, who evolved into mammals. They all did branching out along the way, but specifically, mammals branched out into apes, who evolved into humans.

I'm sure your next question is, "Why are there still fish, amphibians, lizards, birds, other mammals, and apes, when it all ends with us?"

Well, it doesn't really end with us. We fit into a niche. Our niche is obviously not the ocean. That's why there are fish. Our niche was similar to the ape niche before we figured out tool use and language, but once we got the hang of those, our niche expanded out beyond the jungle.

If you'd paid attention in science class, you would know this. I can only assume that your attention span is relatively short, for you not to have noticed the 'CARTOON' elements in the theories competing with evolution.

P.S.
The plural form of 'fish', is 'fish'. 'Fishes' is only proper when referring to multiple species of fish. Also, there is a 'Check Spelling' tool, you may want to look into that. These sorts of mistakes make you look like an ***. There are interesting arguments to be made against evolution. It helps if you actually understand evolution, to understand the arguments for and against. But, even if you had a rock solid argument against evolution, no one is going to take you seriously when you don't use capitalization and are too lazy to get the computer to check your spelling.

Answer 9

I imagine sooner or later we will evolve through some kind of artificial, technological enhancement.

Funny you should say but it will be straight from a cartoon "Ghost in the Shell" is fairly close to the mark only not by 2030's but further along and slower to take place - I expect Christians to fight tooth and nail against it. If it's one thing I've realized is that Christians really hate change (unless it's backwards).

Answer 10

If you have a question to ask, or even a constructive comment, please do so, but try to know at least a little bit of what you're talking about, and try to make some sense, okay?

And by the way, the nucleus of an atom is sub-microscopic, so no one has ever witnessed its collapse. Try to tell the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that this fact means fusion did not occur.

Answer 11

we extremely share useful factors with particularly distinctive creatures in the main the super apes and monkeys. Whales extremely have finger bones of their fins. i could desire that some day mankind evolves into attractiveness and looses the could kill one yet another. this would not be a visual function yet a state of being a state of concepts genetically imprinted into our brains.