After all, Bush has fallen for every trap OSAMA has set for him
George is even EXPORTING targets for the Jihad...we are LOSING because we are fighting THEIR fight on THEIR turf
Newsflash.....WAR LOVERS..we are not going to WIN...the USA does not know what winning is
2007-06-19 02:19:05 · 13 answers · asked by Roscoe R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Duh, Bush is by far the most incompetent president in a long time. He has played right into their hands.
2007-06-19 02:32:27 · answer #1 · answered by truthspeaker10 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Is it Bush who's maintaining Osama? Is he making advantageous that Osama isn't caught until and until all of Bush's plans are finished. --- valid question. there have been numerous comments that Osama bin encumbered grew to become into observed early in the Afghanistan warfare in a motorcade and concentrated for bombs yet country pilots have been advised to no longer drop the bombs. the reality that Osama bin encumbered has no longer been arrested six+ years after 09-11-2001 does improve some actual questions it style of feels to me. If Saddam Hussein could be arrested, why no longer Osama bin encumbered? Who knows for advantageous? in step with probability the historians will gradually style it out over the subsequent two decades or so?
2016-12-13 07:13:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe that they care for Bush at all. He has made their lives very uncomfortable.
Traps!? Ok. I guess if you want to count our response to being attacked a trap.
Osama wanted a war, true. But, he sure didn't think they would get rolled over like a road apple.
And he was counting on public opinion turning after body bags started coming home. He sure got that right.
Now, you obviously don't understand any military theory, cuz, the concept is to fight on the enemies land, not your own. Genius.
The US can win wars. Building a country out of a bunch of grudge holding ingrates. No.
2007-06-19 02:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
OMG! Do a little research Buddy. It's Clinton that sat back and did nothing and that's why the attacks got worse and worse. Yeah he did a LITTLE bombing after the Embassy bombings, but not much more beyond that. And they were from aircraft, I remember watching them leave in the morning and come back empty.
And noone is a WAR LOVER. But many of us understand what it takes to keep our country safe and the help others in need.
2007-06-19 03:12:12 · answer #4 · answered by Just me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He has disrupted their network, brought the world's eyes down upon them, made it impossible for them to continue their conquest of the world by usurping democracies or, like in Africa, killing off much of the non-Islamic population, and has hunted Osama until he his hiding in caves like a rat.
Of course they shouldn't.
Since the death rate is roughly 6 to 1 in our favor (6 of the jihadists vs. one of our soldiers), I'd say we're doing pretty well. That's the best ratio of any modern war (save a few individual battles) in history!
We already won. We're not doing something very different. We're fighting OTHER Islamic militants who are seeing to overthrow our victory in Iraq. Are you foolish enough to believe that war is an activity like tic-tac-toe? Someone wins, and it's over?
Goodness sake, it's more like tag, never ending, and it's been going on with Islam for centuries. You are unfamiliar with how many attacks they've made on our embassies and ships in the last few decades? They're not done, but they're definitely losing for one reason:
Freedom. Their people see it, they want it, and they're speaking up for the first time in centuries. The Web, radio, television. Islamic dictators can't control it all. The revolution has started. That's what this is about. Awareness.
You've chosen sides in WWIII.
So have we.
2007-06-19 02:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
they love the Democrats, because the Democrats want to let them go and not fight any of them. They are practiaclly rooting for the terrorists, by saying things like we aren't going to win and things like that. I hate to tell you but that's treason, which is a very serious crime.
There is a difference between freedom of spech and treason, just like you can't say fire in a crowded building, saying the country is going to lose and those extremist who say that are no better than the terrorists.
Just because you hear only negative things doesn't mean we are losing, that is the prob with Dems like Harry Reid he says we are losing and now everyone believes him, boy he is doing a real dis-service to his country by spreading negative propaganda for his own political gain.
would you rather fight them on our turf? I'm pretty sure you have no clue what you are talking about and are just spreading negative propaganda.
2007-06-19 02:26:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They already DO!
We can win all right. Just pull our troops about 30 miles outside the cities, then level every one of them with nuclear missiles. Take about 20 minutes for the mushroom clouds to disapate, leaving Iraq a glassed over desert.
Then we take aim at Iran. Very simple really.
2007-06-19 02:28:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes he has kind of proved their point. However, I disagree with your part about not knowing what winning is.
2007-06-19 02:29:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
News flash Roscoe, why are you such a defeatist loser? Were you an abused child ?
2007-06-19 02:25:31 · answer #9 · answered by booman17 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why dont you join your cry baby terrorists there Roscoe... If you support the terrorist cowards, please, feel free to join them... I know many people over there that would love to take care of you.
2007-06-19 02:29:47 · answer #10 · answered by Dan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
By "love", do you mean physically? Because that's just icky.
2007-06-19 02:22:04 · answer #11 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋