The paradox of this question does not reflect on G-d. Rather, it reflects on our human limitations to comprehend the divine. We must put G-d in human terms to consider him (for this is our own frame of reference and understanding), and this is not at all accurate, and results in a very limited and subjective understanding of G-d.
Due to this, when trying to comprehend G-d, paradoxes come into the equation. Similarly, you could ask if G-d can duplicate himself or destroy himself or limit his power, or remove himslef from a certain place or time, or chose not to know something. These are all the same type of paradoxical questions that do not reflect on the objective and true nature of G-d, but rather on the smallness of our own mind and our inability to comprehend the divine.
2007-06-19 02:37:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by supcch063 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In an n-dimensional universe God can do both.
He can create something so heavy that He himself cannot carry it and in the same time He himself can carry it.
2007-06-19 08:46:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by jojovas4 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
God is not separate from anything...and so there is no separate body to do the lifting.
Omnipotence and Omnipresence are confusing to the mind. But being able to do anything within itself is the answer.
~ Eric Putkonen
2007-06-19 08:49:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The true question is can god microwave a burrito so hot that even he could not eat it?
2007-06-19 08:43:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by John C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The church will get back to you on this one when they have finally decided how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
2007-06-19 08:40:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dharma Nature 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oi! Sabi ni sir dapat galing sa yo ung sagot mo. Ikaw ha...
2007-06-19 10:56:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Raywilson G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. God can't do anything out of His nature. So He can't do something He can't do.
2007-06-19 08:39:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by RB 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, because gods are imaginary.
2007-06-19 08:38:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋