The Apostle John calls the Man of Sin the “Antichrist” for good reason. The name Man of Sin implies an entity that would be against or opposing the righteous ways of Christ. But the Greek prefix anti signifies “instead of” or “in place of.”[6] Anti is used 20 times in the New Testament as a complete word and never does it have the meaning of “against.” Nineteen times it is translated “for” as in Romans 12:17, “Recompense no man evil for evil.”[7] We should not return or replace evil with evil. Thus “Antichrist” replaces the position of Christ. Since Antichrist is also called the Man of Sin, obviously the operating principles of this system would be also against the principles of Christ.
Summary of the Apostles’ Clues:
The Man of Sin was at work in Paul’s day, but was not a literal man for then he would be almost 2,000 years old.
The Man of Sin is a counterfeit body of Christ, that is, a system of lawlessness intent on setting up a pseudo Kingdom of God contrary to God’s arrange
2007-06-19
00:31:27
·
6 answers
·
asked by
?
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Summary of the Apostles’ Clues:
The Man of Sin was at work in Paul’s day, but was not a literal man for then he would be almost 2,000 years old.
The Man of Sin is a counterfeit body of Christ, that is, a system of lawlessness intent on setting up a pseudo Kingdom of God contrary to God’s arrangement and laws.
The Man of Sin was held back by the Pagan Roman Empire until a Roman Emperor joined forces with the power-hungry element of the Christian Church.
The Man of Sin system would be in full operation, identified and revealed before the dead and living in Christ are “gathered” to him.
The revealment of the Man of Sin system would be preceded by the apostasy, a great defection from pure Christian doctrine.
Professed Christians are the temple of God in which the Man of Sin will be exalted.
“Antichrist” signifies not only against Christ, but in place of Christ.
What are your thoughts?
*H*
2007-06-19
00:36:26 ·
update #1