English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Jesus went to India to learn...
His missing years 14 to 29.....where was he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxhcWUSoE4Y&mode=related&search=

So much of evidence...Jesus did went to india. Ofcourse this truth will not be accepted by christians because this will mean the end of Christianity.

2007-06-18 22:22:53 · 12 answers · asked by Hare Krishna 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Life of Buddha(trailer)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0v9dBR8o_I&mode=related&search=

2007-06-18 22:25:01 · update #1

Jesus documented evidence in Kashmir(India). Jesus a saintly man who possess mystic Yogic powers.."walk on water"....Healing....All these are Yogic powers which is common in India.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOWil2UUrU8&mode=related&search=

2007-06-18 22:34:41 · update #2

Christian as well as Muslim scriptures, and old medical and historical books including ancient Buddhist records, provide evidence about this journey. Jesus is shown to have reached Afghanistan, and to have met the Jews who had settled there after deliverance from the bondage of Nebuchadnezzar. From Afghanistan Jesus went on to Kashmir, where other Israelite tribes had settled. There he made his home, and there in time he died; his tomb has been found in Srinagar.

2007-06-18 22:37:18 · update #3

12 answers

Jesus was a fictional character so he never went anywhere.

2007-06-18 22:26:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Jesus never went there to learn anything.
Jesus was being raised by his parents.
That's why everyone still can recognize Him as a carpenter's son. If Jesus went to India in such a long time, nobody would recognize Him.

Besides... in Jewish community, they tend to help their parents up until age 30 and then they can tend to their own family or start a new job on their own.

That's when Jesus started His preaching. Not before that, even though John the Baptist already pronounce Him as Messiah couple of years before Jesus reached 30.

2007-06-18 22:36:14 · answer #2 · answered by IcyCool 4 · 0 0

Even though he went to india, he is a role model, no one can be compared to him. The bible made us to understand that he went about doing good. So if he went to India, what has that got to do with us, what makes you feel that is the end of Christianity and is india not a country, what is so spetacular about india? He has every right to go anywhere he likes. And besides this screen shot is from BBC which can frame things own their own

2007-06-18 22:36:36 · answer #3 · answered by onoscity 4 · 0 0

Jesus never left the holy land during His life and the flimsy evidence you have provided is at best mere speculation, it was St.Thomas the Apostle who went to preach the gospel to India and it seems that somehow people have got their wires crossed over this.

2007-06-18 22:43:26 · answer #4 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0 0

according to the gnostic gospels, yes.

but then again, according to the gnostic gospels Jesus was trapped in a flesh cage, and had a hologram that died on the cross instead of Him. He also would shape shift into a little kid, then into an old man. And that He killed a little boy when He was young.

2007-06-21 15:40:58 · answer #5 · answered by (insert creative name here) 3 · 0 0

You're mixing tenses, that should be "Did Jesus go to India?"

No, I don't think he went to India. Just because the Bible didn't mention him for a few years doesn't mean he went to India.

2007-06-18 22:27:16 · answer #6 · answered by Lesbian & Uniterian 2 · 0 0

What if he did? I's a free world not? that is not going to make any diference on what is true and what is not !!

I went to Germany and that doesn't make me a Nazi.

Animals submit to man without even reading a book,
.....Animals are better than man! ........well....most men.

2007-06-18 22:40:46 · answer #7 · answered by Davinci22 3 · 0 0

no jesus didnt go to india.....it was one of his disciples who came to india to spread christianity

2007-06-18 22:34:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, he didn't go to India, because he was allergic to curry!

2007-06-18 22:34:33 · answer #9 · answered by mad_mick001 5 · 0 0

No he did not.

2007-06-18 22:31:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers