English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

statement on militry rule

2007-06-18 18:33:44 · 12 answers · asked by Ricky 1 in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

YES IT SHOULD BE MADE MORE TOUGH.

2007-06-18 18:46:00 · answer #1 · answered by FUNNY GUY. 4 · 0 1

The world is striving hard to propagate importance of democracy...
Please study the disadvantages of military rule before recommending it for India…
It will make the life of the people a hell... no progress... no fundamental rights... no freedom of press… no freedom of expression… no free judiciary… you would not live the life of a free human being… would be reduced to almost slaves…
The experiments of military rules have failed... even communism also failed in Russia, china and some east European countries...
Democracy should prevail... however, we have to be properly educated to implement democracy and practice it in real sense...
Do not opt to be ruled by others… do learn to rule yourself…

2007-06-18 19:28:49 · answer #2 · answered by Harish Jharia 7 · 0 0

Unfortunately " no " is answer for u

Now a days creditability's in UNO statics is made by the stability of the country and how long does stability last.
Like we are stable since last 60 years and we had only 1 suspension ( Indra Gandhi`s time )
so we came in quite stable state
in 93 when we were having economic crises russia supported us on basis of " initial stability and long frendship "
Righ now we are most stable though we are frustated internally cze we are ill from inside

Consider yourself standding in a party with fabulas dress
but inside you are having fever . . . .but you will not show it to every 1 in party

yaa you can do manythings by yourself like ' rubbing your hand on head etc "

Now in above story place " India insted of u ". . . " party as UNO " Fever as corruption and other problems in India " , . . . . " hand as person who wants to improve and are the part of body. . ."




I hope i hade made it very clear that we cannot bring military changes. . .
Always remember " Evolution is better then a revolution. . . cze it stays longer "


Thanks for reading till this line

2007-06-20 16:49:51 · answer #3 · answered by Mac 2 · 0 0

Democracy..Democracy..Democracy

I am tired of this so-called Democracy..where people are NOT aware of the Politics, Constitution... where above 50% of the people don't vote anyway..and when they do, they elect movie actors, murderers, cheaters, rapists, dons, corrupt officials, etc..The price of a vote is Rs.10..or a packet of food...

So what Democracy we are talking about??

"THE MASSES ARE A MASS OF FOOLS"...

I am in favour of a "JUST" military Dictator..

"Watan ko agar kisine nuqsan pahunchaney ki koshish ki, tow usey sidha goli maar-do" ...Qissa khatam !

2007-06-18 19:54:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in the present scenario, no country could go in for a solution of military rule. in dur course of time it will lead to anarchy.democracy si the best but for it's effecient working people are its strength. at no point of time, India should resort to military rule.

2007-06-18 18:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by Archu 1 · 0 0

India is a multi racial country, no one can rule it by force for a long time.

2007-06-18 19:04:38 · answer #6 · answered by younmanofthegarden 5 · 0 0

No , not military, but some kind of really strict measures against govt. and police corruption. High time corruption left India!

2007-06-18 19:33:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ya it should be implemented but by a very noble man it should be like subhash chandra bose not like gandhi or jawarharlal nehru

2007-06-18 21:03:59 · answer #8 · answered by anadi_delhi 1 · 0 0

No, the guys who do snake charming should rule, they have newves of steel...WOO HOO

2007-06-18 20:55:36 · answer #9 · answered by mar036 3 · 0 0

No

2007-06-19 01:25:07 · answer #10 · answered by J 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers