SCIENCE has proved that There was God !?

Question

I just happened to read this question

What makes athiests so sure that God doesn't exist?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApC3I6PcvXV6fL8gSDtisDXd7BR.?qid=20070616174636AAtEYYl

And questioner had mentioned that
"even science prooved there was God. so what makes you sure there isn't. what makes you think that He doesn't exist."

Ok this is my real question;

What are the prove that Science had provided for God's existence ?


Please don't provide me with your kindergarden teacher's science knowledge.

Answer 1

In order to disprove something, the thing must first exist. Atheists are waiting patiently. Those that give a crap that is.

Answer 2

The problem is that Science does not have the tools to prove or disprove the existence of God. Math fails every time we get an answer with an infinite term, attempt to square to neg numbers, deal with any number that has an unknown answer, use renormalization, try to find the area of anything other than a quadrilateral or do any of a million different experiments that require any of these math tools. So the fact that God cannot be proven by science does not suprise me. I would think the strongest proof that there is God is the fact that it cannot be proven he does not exist. It is quite simple to prove that something does not exist, you simply ask reasonable people if it exists and if they say no, it does not exist. But when you ask the brightest minds if God exists, they simply say that it can not be proven but they believe it to be true.
I question every day the intelligence of people that ask the question knowing that there is no answer.

Answer 3

The fact of the matter is: There is a God before science was and not the other way round !

To prove There Is A God By His Own Handiwork and By His Created Human Being much be a very amuzing and laughable sight to see way up there where HE dwells!

A slightly more enlightened human by the name of Einstein, wrotes and says the following. Maybe we should take heed to a mind that's not only thinking but took a leap in faith when he say:-
"The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking. Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
The most imcomprehensible thing about the universe it that it is comprehensible.
I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know God's thoughts, the rest are details"

Food for thoughts for everyone including the atheist !

Answer 4

"even science prooved there was God. so what makes you sure there isn't. what makes you think that He doesn't exist."

Take another look: prooved? No such word in English, proving that there's no God or what he's saying is really BS.

The fact that someone said something doesn't necessarily mean it's true. When someone types something, and it's spelled wrong, then I'd suspect there's something fishy going on (no puns intended on the "fish" in Greek Jesus acronym?). He didn't mention where he found the proof or maybe give us a link as to where we could see the proof and judge for ourselves? Maybe if he could show proof, then maybe I'd believe you. Otherwise, I'm sticking to "if there's God, there's no need for parents."
Then again: Think of it at another angle "How can science proof there's no God?" Simple: There's no DNA from God.
If there was, then God would really be superior to everyone else: 4 blood types, both male and female chromosomes, rainbow hair, a prism of eye colors, gray-orange-purple-green skin, stained teeth, like glass from church window, hair like Samson's which is the source of his strength but once cut off or burned would leave him weak? In typing all this, I have another question: Did dinosaurs die off? Or did they go to heaven? If they did go to heaven, how come there were no apparitions or
blood tears from figurines of dinosaurs seen by people?

The Bible says that what shows God's existence is "aidios dunamis kai theiotes." This means "eternal power and divinity."

Really? I just saw Aliens vs. Predators: In the movie, Predators were an alien race who are really technologically advanced. Their advanced technology would make them divine. Their ability to fight off the Aliens would give them eternal power.

Doesn't that mean I should worship Predators?

Answer 5

Science has absolutely nothing to say on the matter. Gods are outside the realms of science and their existence cannot be proved or disproved. They are like the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus and the invisible pink unicorn that lives in my garden. Science has nothing to say about any of them because they are supernatural. Science deals with the natural not the supernatural.

Answer 6

It is antithetical for a theist to want science to prove the existence of god. Religion rests on faith, which is belief without reason. Evidence and proof are in the realm of the material. To adopt faith is to put those concerns aside for the beliefs in question. Once science proved god, faith would be dead.

Answer 7

ROTFL! How 'bout that! Now I too must become a fundie. I mean, if SCIENCE proved God, right? He either watched these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNTGmoTb8sw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z-OLG0KyR4
(now there's great science!) or has "faith" that science proves God.

Either way, it's funny, frightening and dangerous all in one.

Edit: I AM GOD's theory is perhaps the most ridiculous thing I've heard all day! Congratulations, I AM GOD!

Answer 8

Science does not deal with the realm of the supernatural. The supernatural is OUTSIDE the scope of science, since when you invoke it, anything goes. Nothing in the supernatural can be tested or observed... therefore, it isn't scientific.

Science does nothing to prove or disprove any god. It simply attempts to explain the world around us.

...that, friend, is kindergarten teacher's science knowledge.

Answer 9

There is a physics professor at Tulane University who claims to have formulated a mathematical proof for god. This has been picked up by some of the media and discussed to some extent in the popular media. However, his peers in the physics community have dismissed his "proof" as pseudoscience, with several underlying erroneous assumptions.

Answer 10

science doesn't touch imaginary things....try literature class instead.

The question you quote is a bad reference. Why? They claim something but offer no reference or source. So, they had no source...and neither do you.

I'll believe Science proves the existence of a deity when he's put in my science books.