http://blip.tv/file/227958?filename=Squamatareport-TheGreatGlobalWarmingSwindleVideo141.avi?

Question

This is the difinitive movie for all to see how greed and cruelty have affected the decisions of many well intentioned peolpe.Think again after watching this and look around you.Bono wants more money for Africa,wants to feed them.Fair enough.But this will always keep them in a position of needing to be fed.Starving people for fear that industrizing them will threaten our planet is what is on the line here.

http://blip.tv/file/227958

Dihydrogen monoxide hoax
That last word is exactly what the global warming movement is all about.Thanks HH

Answer 1

Africans don't have the nuclear bomb.

I am more worried about the reactions of both China and India to the stringent demands that will be placed on them to "solve" this problem.

The burden of proof lies with the AGW alarmists. Much of what they say, especially in regards to alternate hypotheses, is NOT fact. That's the point. AGW is a loose set of hypotheses that does not rise to the level of theory, regardless of what science-less wonks like Bob have to say. And while there is much to think about in Swindle, it is also a loose set - and arguably a looser set - of hypotheses.

Answer 2

That movie is bogus.

It is simply a political statement which distorts science. The director has a history of putting out misleading stuff. In 1997 he made a series for Channel 4 called “Against Nature”, which compared environmentalists with Nazis. Channel 4 had to apologise publicly for the misleading stuff in that one. The present movie is also a distortion of the science. More here:

"A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors."

http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece

"Pure Propaganda"

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php

Explanations of why the science is wrong.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/swindled/

History of the director.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Durkin_(television_director)

Gore's movie may be a little over dramatic, but it has the basic science right. This movie does not.

Channel 4 itself undercuts the movie in a funny way. If you go to their website on the movie you find links to real global warming information. They also have a way to "Ask the Expert" about global warming. The questions go to a respected mainstream scientist who supports (mostly) human responsibility for global warming.

So, why did Channel 4 broadcast it?

"The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy."

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032572,00.html

Answer 3

Why do you call it a definitive movie? It's produced by Martin Durkin, no more needs to be said, just Google him.

With all due respect, learn about global warming then you'll know yourself how truly ridiculous the movie is.

Answer 4

That movie completely ignores the most dangerous greenhouse molecule that causes more global heating than CO2. This molecule has been scientifically proven to be of much greater concentration in greenhouse gases than that miniscule CO2.

All research that substantiates CO2 as the culpret inadvertantly implicates this molecule as well but the media has been hush.

It is the NUMBER ONE GREENHOUSE GAS!!!!

This molecule is going to destroy the planet! We must do something about this before it's too late!

I'm talking about the dreaded molecule -----

Dihydrogen Monoxide!!




Look it up in your scientific reports. It's really true!

Answer 5

scary