As science improves, most people now understand that things we observe like planetary motion, disease, weather patterns, etc., all have scientific explanations and don't require the belief in a divine being. Why hold out for a divine explanation on "creation?" Is it because these are harder issues to explain/understand scientifically, or is it that humans need to have a reason for being?
Understand, I personally am not an atheist, because I allow for the possibility of a divine presence, I just doubt there is one. If you answer this question by saying that God's presence can be ascertained by the big questions of creation, do you also believe that God is "responsible" for a tsunami that kills thousands, or a horrible disease that effects children?
2007-06-18
02:40:59
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Stephen L
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
So let me get this straight from some of those who answered: What God creates he can destroy, so that even though people are devastated by a child dying, it's God's "right" to do or allow this, especially since the child will go to heaven anyway (which begs the question why "create" the child in the first place, and what kind of God would cause such pain). Weather patterns can be God's doing, but not necessarily, and some of these, in which thousands of innocents are killed, are sent by God as a "warning" to us, and in some connection to our original sin.
How strange that you people actually believe in this nonsense. But worse than that, is that you (or we) have created a God that is mean-spirited, vindictive, and arbitrary.
2007-06-18
04:20:58 ·
update #1