Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, i agree....there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.
The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.
While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.
At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.
2007-06-17 18:08:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
on the contrary, the interconnectedness of world economies may well make a third world war more likely. World wars happen as a result of competition between major powers for geo-political dominance. Basically, a world war occurs when a new power enters the great game and disrupts the balance of power, leading to a period of economic warfare and diplomatic tension, ultimately resulting in open warfare. Geo-politics is really messy, and we really don't seem to have learned anything from the past couple centuries. My prediction is that over the next few decades, as China continues to expand economically, we will come into increasing conflict with them economically and politically, until we reach the point where we can either accept China as the world leader/superpower or fight a big war to try to turn back the clock (which is what the world wars were really about).
2007-06-18 20:34:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jacob M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, now allow me reply your query correctly. First, Armageddon is truthfully the situation in which the last struggle will take situation, no longer the occasion of the arena finishing. It's a unique valley (also known as Megiddo) external Jerusalem. COULD that last struggle be related to WWIII? Yes and no. The international main as much as the End shall be riddled with wars, tsunamis, earthquakes... But as it is one struggle and no longer an precise struggle, it is rough to name it that. Also, the struggle occurs after the Rapture, which hasn't occurred but. Since nobody however God is aware of whilst the Rapture is, we would have a WWIII day after today and feature the Rapture take situation hundreds of thousands of years from now. Hope this is helping.
2016-09-05 19:38:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.
Albert Einstein
2007-06-17 17:28:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Psst..... Ever heard the word Armageddon?
It's coming to a planet near you, probably sooner than you think.
2007-06-17 15:58:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
OK. It's gonna be Armageddon.
2007-06-17 16:11:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by 4HIM- Christians love 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
From your lips to God's ears... I pray you are right.
Thank you.
2007-06-17 16:00:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"WWI. the war to end all wars" yea, right.
2007-06-17 16:34:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by popeyethesadist 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't be so certain about that.
2007-06-17 16:06:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok...what?
2007-06-17 15:58:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Glen B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋