English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-17 09:15:00 · 12 answers · asked by kamalkishor45 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

12 answers

Jab sidhi ungli se ghee nahi nikle tou tedi karna hi zaroori ho jata hei.
but main problem is la [money] and [take] order.
force is source of corruptions.

2007-06-18 07:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by Girish Sharma,yahoo superstar 6 · 19 0

perhaps u'd ask: Is force necessary for enforcing any law ?
then I'll answer YES.
when force is lacking in behind the implementation of any leagal conduct or ethics, then yu'll refer to such situation as lax-law.
in this situation, the law can be subverted, broken or evaded by individuals. Therefore to have any useful law in place there's required a substantial amount of force to make it work.
naturaaly people tend to do things that suites their way of life thus everyone lived a chaos and inorderly life but uniformity comes in when law is enforced.
However the type or cource of the force is a subject of another debate. generally forcedo come from law enforcement agents like the cops, tax authorities and you and I....
I'm feeling sleepy right now baby, see u tomorrow, I might do an edit to above

2007-06-17 16:26:33 · answer #2 · answered by beauty princess 3 · 0 1

Yes - having said that, there are different levels of force to be applied to enforce those laws (varies by department and state)....

1. Command presence
2. Verbal commands
3. Pain compliance - physical holds
4. Chemical agents - pepper spray, mace, etc...
5. Baton - striking
6. Less than deadly force - rubber bullets, tasers, etc...
7. Deadly force.

There's more to "force" than what you ordinarily think of...

Calif Deputy

2007-06-17 19:09:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

The government uses force to accomplish all things. You are responsible for your own safety, the government is just the clean up crew, and usually the cause of most violent actions.

Having Freedom = Giving Freedom

If you take someone else's property against their will, you have taken their freedom. They have the right to defend their freedom and compensation for your violation of their rights.

The free market can handle things more productively than the government can. The current government will not be able to sustain itself due to the taxation and regulations it puts on the free market.

There is a lot of evidence of communism, fascism and blatant disregard for the freedoms this country was founded on.

2007-06-17 17:30:20 · answer #4 · answered by IRLostOrRu 2 · 0 1

Only the amount of force necessary, and reasonable.

2007-06-17 16:20:39 · answer #5 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 1 0

No force? Then why would anyone listen?

"Look buddy, stop raping and murdering people, or we will have to give you another warning because we can't actually arrest you."

Sounds like the way liberals would want the world... they're willing to sacrifice decent members of society for the "freedoms" of murderers and terrorists.

2007-06-17 16:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes. Read the word en"force"ment.

2007-06-18 09:36:47 · answer #7 · answered by cqm 4 · 0 0

The law should be such that 99% people understand it easily and fall in line.

2007-06-18 04:00:01 · answer #8 · answered by Vijay D 7 · 0 0

yes only for Indians

Others fall in line even w/o force

2007-06-19 02:51:20 · answer #9 · answered by dynamo 2 · 0 0

yes - when needed.

2007-06-17 16:17:53 · answer #10 · answered by dude 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers