English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

umm i dont get it

2007-06-16 20:06:10 · answer #1 · answered by christina v 1 · 0 0

In the beginning nature testified to primitive life not mans obedience now over time and with the cumulative advancement of knowledge we have a far better life testifying to the ability of mankind to improve his environment hardly the wrath of god . and as education and the accessibility of science becomes more widespread and accepted the decline of superstition will hopefully open the door to a better more reasonable life for those who are aware that we have the means to aim for a more Utopian society . society is somewhat as Freud said in it's adolescence and hopefully progressing to it's more mature adult hood . So I hardly agree as I'm aware of the psychological comparison of these
religious beliefs apart from moral relevance as similar to an adolescent neurosis . Science and knowledge just don't seem to agree with the imagined superstitious beliefs that give religion its tactical foundation in theistic terms . Just as we know better than to sacrifice the proverbial virgin to the Vulcano for appeasement to the gods and an improved crop yield eventually we will learn how to find comfort in real scientific development rather fantasy and we will profit from
our clear headed approach in our sanity and reality.
peace

2007-06-17 03:25:59 · answer #2 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 0

Nope. You really need to get a life.

2007-06-17 03:15:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. I don't even know where to start with that one. Wrong in almost every way.

2007-06-17 03:08:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers