Because, based on evidence like the observable expansion of the universe and background radiation, a so-called 'big bang' is suggested. Saying 'God made the Big Bang' is untestable and multiplying entities without good reason.
2007-06-16 14:46:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not everybody who believes in the Big Bang also believes that a higher power is ridiculous. (Like me, for example.)
When Hubble first came up with the Big Bang concept, a lot of people (like Einstein) didn't like it because it sounded too much like creationism.
But the Big Bang has the evidence. But rather than rejoice at the fact that science seems to be pointing a specific moment of creation ... the creationists reject science anyway. Why? Because the timeline doesn't fit the Genesis acount of the number of generations from Adam-to-Noah. That's it.
Now for a counter-question. Why do some people who believe God said "let there be light" on a Tuesday 6,000 years ago, find it ridiculous that God might have said "let there be light" over 14 billion years ago? Because a book lists the geneology from Adam to Noah? That's it? That's the only reason for pegging this at 6,000 years and violating pretty much all of science from astronomy, to physics, radiometry, geology, paleontology, archaeology, cave-art history, ice cores, and Einstein's speed of light? The Adam-to-Noah geneology trumps all of science?
Now *that*'s funny, you have to admit!
2007-06-16 14:45:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by secretsauce 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm an agnostic and no, i do no longer have confidence the vast bang theory. that's maximum probable with the aid of fact i've got not got adequate awareness of the sector. even with the undeniable fact that, i've got confidence that the vast bang theory ought to no longer have got here approximately with the aid of fact it defies maximum of regulations and rules that I even have discovered by physics. there is not any way i will see that each thing in the universe might have been compacted into one factor, one atom and with none exterior suggestions, amplify quickly to the universe as that's immediately. i think of that this "theory" grew to become into created as a fashion to describe a taking place (the commencing up of the universe and time) that human beings can not decide. human beings can not photograph the existence of a risk that the universe might have been indefinite, without commencing up or an end and to that end a theory grew to become into created with what I evaluate bogus data as a fashion to fulfill the persons's crave of an answer to a theory they decline to hold close.
2016-12-13 04:57:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by mento 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess people like to play the LONG SHOT
CREATION would be the Vegas Odds maker choice
ACCIDENTAL would be the LONG SHOT
I am open to the possiblity ACCIDENTAL could, and did, indeed happen, but the ODDS AGAINST IT ARE SO HIGH, that I have to side with an SUPER INTELLEGENCE helping it happen with WILLFUL INTENT
That is the MOST LIKELY explaination.
That is OKUMS Razor!
And the Razor is generally right.
The SIMPLEST explaination is usually the right explaination.
So, taking STATISTICS, MATH, SCIENCE into account
CREATION BY A MIND is the most likely choice possible.
This does NOT rule out SERENDIPITY, but the ODDS are almost infinity on that one!
2007-06-16 15:43:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's probably because there is more evidence to believe that there was a Big Bang that started the universe as we know it today.
That does not rule out the possibility that a higher power was the "detonator" behind that whole Big Bang, though.
When you study this stuff, think of it as studying the way God works. It really doesn't have to be a threat to your religion.
2007-06-16 14:45:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by I'm Still Here 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
If, by "higher power," you mean something with an intellect, and intent, nothing has been scientifically observed that indicates that such a thing exists.
There are only ancient myths, and subjective "experiences." These provide insight into the human mind. Nothing more.
2007-06-16 14:52:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by YY4Me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because that higher power isn't supposed to be doing any banging. ;)
(That was the humorous part-now for the serious stuff)
It is because logic and reason preclude fairy-tales and superstition.
Who created the 'higher power'?
2007-06-16 14:47:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by No Chance Without Bernoulli 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You are correct, to me one is just as plausible as the other.The simple fact of the matter is no one may ever know for sure (unless the higher power decides we should know).
;)
2007-06-16 15:00:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um... it's real science. Why don't you do us all a favor and educate yourself? It makes more sense than a magic fairy coming along and with a tap of the wand, there's earth!
2007-06-16 14:46:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kai 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
good question, that's why I think God could have influenced the start of the world maybe the big bang was created by God
2007-06-16 14:45:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by SmartayAngel 2
·
0⤊
1⤋