Evolution 101
2007-06-16 13:56:15 · 27 answers · asked by Mary Magdalene 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Evolution doesn't disprove or prove God.
Duh 101.
2007-06-16 13:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by Diavola 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why does it always have to be one or the other? I mean I agree we evolved; however I believe their is a being that made me. The bible says god created the heavens and the earth in 6 days slept on the 7th. I feel who determined god works off our calender? I mean really that's just silly. Plus have you ever played a game where there is character building? The more you play with it the better it gets until you hit a point where you just start messing it up so you leave it and start the game. Then you use the skill points from the game to further and increase your being based on what is now know to be the challenge. Well hence both god and evolution exist.
2007-06-16 21:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by Cbear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution proves there is a Creator.
Evolution says 'creatures' evolved. Think about the word 'Creature'. Is it not a noun meaning 'something created'.
Nothing can be created if there is no force to create it.
I personally think the 'laws' of science are the Creator's/God's/Universal Energy's Tools of creation whereby energy reshapes itself over and over again.
2007-06-16 21:54:44 · answer #3 · answered by feath 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but the last major study conducted in the 70s, had an international team of scientists brought together to disprove God's existance. They all began as atheists but when they gave their final findings, they concluded that the more they looked, the more they had to admit that there must be a God.
2007-06-16 21:09:35 · answer #4 · answered by lix 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science doesn't prove there is no god. That's just silly.
I've never heard of a scientist who made any effort whatsoever to prove that gods don't exist, and if I did hear of such a person, I'd think him or her a fool. And I'm an atheist.
2007-06-16 21:04:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about spelling 101?
2007-06-16 21:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by Me 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Darwinian theory has no pertinence to the idea of a supernatural; it has no relevance to religion at all. Charles Darwin did not premeditate the theory to ignite religious controversy, he developed the theory after years of grueling research and dedication towards unveiling the truth to human existence. Nowhere in his theory is God ever evoked.
2007-06-16 21:15:15 · answer #7 · answered by Abi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude, science is not the standard which you base everything. Just look at darwinian evolution, its very flawed but when a bunch of people say its fact over and over again people start to believe it. If anything those people are the ones who are not using their minds.
2007-06-16 21:04:56 · answer #8 · answered by Ryan K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Common sense proves there's no God. You don't need the theory of evolution.
2007-06-16 21:00:58 · answer #9 · answered by Hugo_Chavez 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hello Mary Magdalene, I though I would tell you, that science did not prove there was no God. I don't know who told you that story, but I can assure you that it is not true.
I think Mary someone has been telling you porkies.
2007-06-16 21:05:58 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it didn't. It's scientifically impossible to prove something does NOT exist, you can only prove it does or that it's unlikely. You can't be everywhere at every point in time to get the empirical evidence necessary to disprove the existence of anything. (This principle is not limited to God. Also applies to undiscovered/unknown substances, reactions, etc.)
2007-06-16 21:00:32 · answer #11 · answered by Hamlette 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋