English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

aw not proof but very sweet lol

hey you grumpy lot
chill out and smile

2007-06-16 13:32:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Nobody has 100% proof of anything.

Yes, roses are nice. Now how is that evidence that a god exists? There's no connection there, really.

Sorry, but your god is just a superstition. Your ignorance about roses does not show that any god exists.

2007-06-16 20:31:53 · answer #2 · answered by nondescript 7 · 6 0

To all the negative people, God does exist! Lets see you create a rose out of nothing. God Bless you all.

2007-06-16 20:42:42 · answer #3 · answered by little chica 1 · 1 0

That isn't even one tenth of one percent of a proof.

Do you really think none of us has ever seen or heard of a rose before?

Just admit you have no proof, there is no evidence, there is no reason to believe, you just believe because you WANT to.

2007-06-17 00:11:52 · answer #4 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 0

Maybe if you said a "Wild rose" (if you can find one) ya might have something more tangible. All domestic rose lines have been tinkered with by various people to improve them, so where's the proof???

2007-06-16 20:39:57 · answer #5 · answered by Sparky77x 2 · 1 0

A rose...? Is that your proof that god exists...?

With that kind of "proof" I don't think that you could convince even the most idiotic of idiots.

You are a fool... and your god is a mere fantasy created by the mind of an even greater fool.

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

2007-06-16 20:34:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

ok then if you have 100% proof inside then just believe...but for me it is getting too late and i have to go to the disco...bye and pray a lot tonight

2007-06-16 20:32:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

there is 100% proof God exists!!!

everything, including you! youre a living walking miracle, and your special

2007-06-16 20:34:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If you had the evidence he existed, then I would believe he existed, but I would never kow tow to any such being as the judeo-christain god and any other could be safely ignored. ( if it was the judeo-christain god, we would have to find some way of killing it. )

PS That means allah, too.

2007-06-16 20:38:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Look, I find nature's mysteries to leave no other conclusion than some higher power, but that doesn't make it /proof/.

2007-06-16 20:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by Diavola 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers