Would you pay more taxes to see murderers, child molesters, and rapists serve their whole sentences?

Answer 1

I'd pay more tax dollars if it meant we could simply eliminate them from the living permenantly. Very few murderers and sex offenders are ever rehabilitated. Why waste tax payer money leaving them in jail and paying for them to live out their lives? Put them down and be done with it. Maybe then people would think twice about the consequences of their actions.

Answer 2

Having people serve their full sentence has nothing to do with taxes -

It has to do with how the taxes already paid are allocated - more goes to waste than actually building and maintaining prisons.

I don't believe the threat of prison stops most criminals - however I do believe that convicted criminals should serve the amount of time they're given.

Answer 3

If what you mean is for them not to have time off for good behavior, then No. I would not want that part of the system changed.

Also, FYI murderers usually are pretty well behaved in prison, and most murderers have killed the biggest problem they've ever had in their lives - if released, most won't kill again. Murder is a crime of passion - boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, wife, lover, etc.

Answer 4

definite there is not any punishment too harsh for those monsters. the U. S. might desire to be harder on criminals who commit heinous crimes and follow in nice condition of many different worldwide places that even decrease of the hands of shoplifters. communicate some deterrent!!!! i do no longer think of the death penalty is the respond considering is rapid and elementary and those idiots might desire to be bodily punished to the component of desirous to die to do away with the discomfort. existence in penal complex isn't the respond for optimistic since our prisons are overcrowded already and that may no longer harsh adequate rather for people who commit crimes against infants. besides why might desire to taxpayers might desire to undergo the load of feeding and housing those criminals. The ACLU cries that we'd wrongly punish an harmless individual so we'd desire to constantly a minimum of impose harsh punishment on somebody the place there is honestly little question approximately their guilt at the same time with somebody this is caught interior the act or admits guilt and is deemed sane. Our judicial equipment is punctiliously backwards as a results of fact we are tender on criminals and hard on victims. What approximately sufferer's rights?

Answer 5

Many of them need to be executed, and the jails need to stop babying the criminals. Turn them over to that sheriff in Maricopa country he knows how to do it..

Answer 6

No! But if you would ad the death penalty then yes!

Answer 7

yes

Answer 8

yes, I would also push the button to make them fry, burn baby burn

Answer 9

they need to be put out of their misery